UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No. )

 

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a‑6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Inogen, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

Payment

(Name of Person(s) Filing Fee (CheckProxy Statement, if other than the appropriate box):Registrant)

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0‑11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:  $_____

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0‑11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:materials

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

 

 

 

 

 


Dear Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Inogen, Inc. (“Inogen”), which will be held at our headquarters, located at 326 Bollay Drive, Goleta, California 93117 on May 9, 2019June 8, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Doors openTime as a virtual meeting. In light of public health concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will be able to attend the meeting, vote and submit your questions via the Internet at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022. You will not be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting physically in person.

At the Annual Meeting, we will ask you to consider the following proposals:

 

To elect three Class II directors from the nominees described in this proxy statement;

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;  2022;  

To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, executive compensation as described in this proxy statement; and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

We are pleased to be furnishing proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the Internet for our Annual Meeting. Consequently, most stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We believe that this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lowers the costs of our Annual Meeting, and conserves natural resources.

On or about March 26, 2019April 21, 2022 we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our Annual Meeting and our annual report to stockholders (“Annual Report”).  The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also includes instructions on how you can vote using the Internet, and how you can request and receive, free of charge, a printed copy of our proxy materials. Our proxy statement and our 20182021 Annual Report can be accessed directly at the following Internet address: http://www.proxyvote.com. All you have to do is enter the control number located on your proxy card. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to submit your vote via the Internet, telephone or mail.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your interest in Inogen.

Sincerely,

Scott Wilkinson

Nabil Shabshab

Chief Executive Officer and President

Goleta, California

March 26, 2019April 21, 2022

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is first being mailed to our stockholders on or about March 26, 2019.April 21, 2022. The proxy materials are first being posted on http://www.proxyvote.com on or about March 26, 2019.April 21, 2022.

 


INOGEN, INC.

326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive

Goleta, CA 93117

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Virtually on June 8, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time

 

Time and Date

Thursday, May 9, 2019Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time.

 

 

 

Place

Inogen, Inc.’s headquarters, locatedThe Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting via live webcast on the Internet.  Because the meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via the Internet, stockholders will not be able to attend the meeting in person. You will be able to attend the meeting, vote and submit your questions on the day of the meeting via the Internet at 326 Bollay Drive, Goleta, CA 93117.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022.

 

 

 

Items of Business

To elect three Class II directors from the nominees described in the proxy statement (Proposal No. 1);

 

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022 (Proposal No. 2);

 

To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, executive compensation as described in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 3); and

 

To transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

 

 

Record Date

March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 (the “Record Date”). Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

 

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

On or about March 26, 2019April 21, 2022 we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our annual meeting and our annual report to stockholders (“Annual Report”). This Notice provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of proxy materials by mail. The proxy statement and our Annual Report can be accessed directly at the following Internet address: http://www.proxyvote.com. All you have to do is enter the control number located on your proxy card.

 

 

 

Voting

IMPORTANT

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read the proxy statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions in the section entitled “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 1 of the proxy statement.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the virtual Annual Meeting to Be Held on May 9, 2019.June 8, 2022. The notice of annual meeting, proxy statement, proxy card, and Annual Report are available by visiting http://www.proxyvote.com.  All you have to do is enter the control number located on your proxy card.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Alison BauerleinJason Somer

Corporate Secretary

Goleta, California

March 26, 2019April 21, 2022

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is first being mailed to our stockholders on or about March 26, 2019.April 21, 2022. The proxy materials are first being posted on http://www.proxyvote.com  on or about March 26, 2019.April 21, 2022.

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

1

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

9

 

 

Nominees for Director

9

Continuing Directors

10

Director Independence

1211

Board Leadership Structure

12

Board Diversity

12

Board Meetings and Committees

12

Audit Committee

13

Compensation Committee

14

Nominating and Governance Committee

1315

Compliance Committee

15

Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Interlocks

1416

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

1416

Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board

1517

Communications with the Board

1617

Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Ethics and Conduct

1618

Risk Management

1718

Director Compensation

1719

2018 2021 Director Compensation Table

1920

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

2023

 

 

Nominees

2023

Vote Required

2023

 

 

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

2124

 

 

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2124

Auditor Independence

2124

Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2225

Vote Required

2225

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

2326

 

 

Vote Required

2326

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

2427

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

2528

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2730

 

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2730

2021 Management Changes*

30

Executive Summary

2731

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Program Design

3134

Governance of Executive Compensation Program

3336

Executive Compensation Elements and Corporate Performance Measure

3539

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

4148

 

-i-


 

 

Tax and Accounting Considerations

41

Executive Employment Arrangements

4248

Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Report

4349

Compensation Risk Assessment

49

2021 Summary Compensation Table

4450

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20182021

4652

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Fiscal Year-End

4753

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vesting During Fiscal 20182021

4955

Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination andor Upon Termination Following a Change in Control

4955

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

59

Equity Compensation Plan Information

5160

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

5261

 

 

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

5564

 

 

OTHER MATTERS

5665

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

5665

Available Information

5665

Company Website

5665

 

 

PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING

5766

 

 

-ii-


 

INOGEN, INC.

326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive

Goleta, California 93117

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR 20192022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Virtually at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on May 9, 2019June 8, 2022

This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Inogen, Inc. (“Inogen” or the “Company”) for use at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, (the “Annual Meeting”), and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof.thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).  The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on Thursday, May 9, 2019the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022 on Wednesday June 8, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time as a virtual meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically in person.  The live webcast of the Annual Meeting can be accessed by stockholders on the day of the meeting at our headquarters, located at 326 Bollay Drive, Goleta, California 93117.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022. On or about March 26, 2019,April 21, 2022, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our Annual Meeting and our annual report to stockholders (“Annual Report”). Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this proxy statement.  Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own.  The person you designate is your “proxy,” and you give the proxy authority to vote your shares by submitting the accompanying proxy card or voting by telephone or over the Internet.  We have designated our Chief Executive Officer and President, Scott Wilkinson,Nabil Shabshab, and our Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer,General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and Corporate Treasurer, Alison Bauerlein,Jason Somer, to serve as proxies for the Annual Meeting.

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Inogen is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at the virtual Annual Meeting (and at any adjournment or postponement of such meeting), which will take place virtually via the Internet on May 9, 2019.June 8, 2022. Stockholders are invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.  This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are being made available on or about March 26, 2019April 21, 2022 in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board.

How do I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The notice of annual meeting, proxy statement, and Annual Report are available by visiting www.proxyvote.com and typing in the control number as set forth (i) on the proxy card (for stockholders of record), or (ii) on the voting instruction form (for individuals who hold shares through a broker, bank, trustee, or nominee).

What information is contained in these materials?

The information included in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of our most highly paid executive officers and our directors, and certain other required information.  Inogen’s Annual Report, which includes our audited financial statements, is being made available along with this proxy statement.

-1-


 

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting include:

the election of three Class II directors to hold office until the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

a proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022;

a proposal to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, executive compensation for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 as described in this proxy statement; and

any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

How does our Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote:

FOR the election of each of the three directors nominated by our Board and named in this proxy statement as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022; and

FOR the approval, on an advisory and non-binding basis, of executive compensation for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 as described in this proxy statement.

Will there be any other items of business on the agenda?

If any other items of business or other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives discretionary authority to the persons named on the proxy card with respect to those items of business or other matters. The persons named on the proxy card intend to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment. Our Board does not intend to bring any other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, and we are not currently aware of any matters that may be properly presented by others for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 15, 2019,April 11, 2022, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.  Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were 21,929,23822,835,794 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.  Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. The shares you are entitled to vote include shares that are (1) held of record directly in your name, and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name.  If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent, then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares.  As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote in personvirtually at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee.  If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, then you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker, bank or other nominee provides.  If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to routine matters but may not vote your shares with respect to any non-routine matters.  Please see “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” below for additional information.

-2-


 

Do I have to do anything in advance if I plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting in person?Meeting?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name.  If you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date, you do not need to do anything in advance to attend and/or vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, but you will need to present government-issued photo identification for entrance to thevirtual Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee.  If you were a beneficial owner at the close of business on the Record Date, you may not vote your shares in person at the virtual Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee who is the stockholder of record with respect to your shares.  You may still attend the Annual Meeting even if you do not have a legal proxy.  For entrance

To access, participate in, and vote at the virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022, you must enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice that you previously received or, if you were a beneficial owner at the close of business on the Record Date, located in the proxy materials you receive from your broker. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the login page for the Annual Meeting.  A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting you will need to provide proof of beneficial ownership asbe available during the entirety of the Record Date, such as the notice or voting instructions you received from your broker, bank or other nominee or a brokerage statement reflecting your ownership of shares as of the Record Date, and also present government-issued photo identification.

Please note that no cameras, recording equipment, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permittedmeeting at the meeting website. After successfully entering your 16-digit control number, you may vote during the Annual Meeting.Meeting and submit questions by following the instructions available on the meeting website. 

How can I contact Inogen’s transfer agent?

You may contact our transfer agent by writing Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233, by telephoning (877) 373-6374 or (781) 575-2879575-3100 (International), or via its Investor Center at www.computershare.com/investor.

WillWhy is the Annual Meeting being held virtually?

Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our employees, stockholders, and other meeting participants, the 2022 Annual Meeting will be webcast?

We doheld as a virtual meeting format only. You will not expectbe able to webcastattend the Annual Meeting.Meeting physically in person.  The live webcast of the Annual Meeting can be accessed by stockholders on the day of the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022.

How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name.  If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote in one of the following ways:

by Internet at www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time, on May 8, 2019June 6, 2022 (have your proxy card in hand when you visit the website);

by toll-free telephone at 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time, on May 8, 2019June 6, 2022 (have your proxy card in hand when you call);

by completing and mailing your proxy card in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or returning it to Vote Processing c/o Broadridge 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, which must be received by us no later than the start of the Annual Meeting (if you received printed proxy materials); or

by written ballot atattending and voting virtually via the Internet during the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee.  If you are the beneficial owner of shares held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee.  You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee in order to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares.  The availability of Internet and telephone voting options will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or other nominee.  As discussed above, if you are a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in personvirtually at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.  

-3-


 

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name.  If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your proxy instructions at any time before the Annual Meeting by:

entering a new vote by Internet or telephone;

signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date;

delivering a written revocation to our Corporate Secretary at Inogen, Inc., 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, CA 93117, at any time prior to the Annual Meeting; or

attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.virtually.

Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request or vote in personvirtually at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee.  If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must contact the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares and follow their instructions to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the virtual Annual Meeting and for ten days prior to the meeting for any purpose germane to the meeting, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at our corporate headquarters at 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, CA 93117, by contacting our Corporate Secretary.

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board.  The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxy holders by our Board.  When a proxy is properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder.  If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board.  If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares.  If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name.  If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

FOR the election of each of the three directors nominated by our Board and named in this proxy statement as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term (Proposal No. 1);

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022 (Proposal No. 2); and

FOR the approval, on an advisory and non-binding basis, of executive compensation for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 as described in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 3).; and

In the discretion of the named proxy holders regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

-4-


 

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee.  If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, then your broker, bank or other nominee will determine if it has discretion to vote on each matter.  Brokers do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters.  Proposal No. 1 (election of directors) and Proposal No. 3 (advisory vote to approve executiveNamed Executive Officer (“NEO”) compensation) are non-routine matters, while Proposal No. 2 (ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm) is a routine matter.  As a result, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to Proposal No. 1 or Proposal No. 3, which would result in a “broker non-vote” on each such proposal, but may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to Proposal No. 2.  For additional information regarding broker non-votes, see “What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?” below.

What is a quorum?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law.  The holders of a majority of the common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in personvirtually or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.  As noted above, as of the Record Date, there were a total of 21,929,23822,835,794 shares of common stock outstanding, which means that 10,964,62011,417,898 shares of common stock must be represented in personvirtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum.  If there is no quorum, (i) the chairperson of the Annual Meeting or (ii) the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present virtually in person or represented by proxy, may adjourn the meeting to a later date.

What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?

An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal.  If a stockholder indicates on its proxy card that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its customers’ shares of record causes abstentions to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  As a result, abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum and will also count as votes against a proposal in cases where approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present virtually in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (e.g., Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 3).  However, because the outcome of Proposal No. 1 (election of directors) will be determined by a plurality vote, abstentions will have no impact on the outcome of such proposals as long as a quorum exists.

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares.  Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast.  Therefore, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily attainable but will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on any proposal.

How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?

Proposal No. 1: The election of Class II directors requires a plurality of the shares of common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved.  This means that the three nominees who receive the most FOR votes will be elected.  You may (i) vote FOR all nominees, (ii) WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, or (iii) vote FOR all nominees except for those specific nominees from whom you WITHHOLD your vote.  Any shares not voted FOR a particular nominee (whether as a result of voting withheld or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.  If you WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, you will be deemed to have abstained from voting on Proposal No. 1, and such abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

-5-


 

Proposal No. 2: The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved.  You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN.  If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 2, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

Proposal No. 2: The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved.  You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN.  If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 2, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

Proposal No. 3: The approval on an advisory and non-binding basis of named executive officerNEO compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN.  Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. However, because this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on us or our Board. Our Board and our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when establishing or modifying the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.NEOs.

How may my brokerage firm or other intermediary vote my shares if I fail to provide timely directions?

Brokerage firms and other intermediaries holding shares of common stock in street name for customers are generally required to vote such shares in the manner directed by their customers.  In the absence of timely directions, your broker will have discretion to vote your shares on our sole “routine” matter — the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP.  Absent direction from you, your broker will not have discretion to vote on the election of directors or on the advisory vote regarding named executive officer compensation.

Who will count the votes?

A representative from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of elections.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report, primarily via the Internet. The Notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials is first being mailed on or about March 26, 2019April 21, 2022 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may request to receive all future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings of stockholders.

How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?

Our Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting by means of the proxy materials.  We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials.  Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokers, banks and other nominees to forward to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such brokers, banks or other nominees.  The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communication, or other means by our directors, officers, employees or agents.  No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.  We do not plan to retain a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies.

If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote over the Internet, you are responsible for Internet access charges you may incur.  If you choose to vote by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur.

What does it mean if I received more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts.  Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

-6-


 

Will members of the Board attend the Annual Meeting?

We encourage, but do not require, the members of our Board to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. Those who do attend will be available to answer appropriate questions from stockholders.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy.  Your vote will not be disclosed either within Inogen or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials.  How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

We have adopted an SEC-approved procedure called “householding,” under which we can deliver a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, the proxy materials to multiple stockholders who share the same address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders.  This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs.  Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards.  Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, the proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these documents.  To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year’s Notice and, if applicable, proxy materials, you may contact us as follows:

Inogen, Inc.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive

Goleta, CA  93117

(805) 562-0500

Stockholders who hold shares in street name may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other nominee to request information about householding.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting.  In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting.  If final voting results are not available to us at that time, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an amendment to the Form 8-K to publish the final results.

What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?

Stockholder Proposals

Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Corporate Secretary in a timely manner.  For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than November 27, 2019.December 22, 2022.  In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials.  Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:

-7-


 

Inogen, Inc.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive

Goleta, CA  93117

Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an Annual Meeting of Stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement.  Our bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an Annual Meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the Annual Meeting by or at the direction of our Board, or (iii) properly brought before the Annual Meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Corporate Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our bylaws.  To be timely for our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:

not earlier than January 11, 2020;February 5, 2023; and

 

not later than February 10, 2020.March 7, 2023.

In the event that we hold our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the first anniversary of the date of the 20192022 Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before such Annual Meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

the 90th day prior to such Annual Meeting; or

the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such Annual Meeting is first made.

If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an Annual Meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such Annual Meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such Annual Meeting.

Nomination of Director Candidates

You may propose director candidates for consideration by our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee.  Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our Board and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above.  For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board.”

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws.  In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.

Availability of Bylaws

A copy of our bylaws may be obtained by accessing our public filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.  You may also contact our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive office for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

 

-8-


 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our business affairs are managed under the direction of our Board, which is currently comprised of eightseven members.  Six of our eightseven directors are independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.  Our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms.  At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

The following table sets forth the names and ages as of March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 and certain other information for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

of term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

 

term

 

for which

 

Name

 

Class

 

Age

 

Position(s)

 

since

 

expires

 

nominated

 

1.  Directors with terms expiring

     at the Annual Meeting/nominees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loren McFarland(1)

 

II

 

60

 

Director

 

2013

 

2019

 

2022

 

Benjamin Anderson-Ray(1)

 

II

 

64

 

Director

 

2013

 

2019

 

2022

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

II

 

54

 

Director, Chief Executive Officer and President

 

2017

 

2019

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  Continuing Directors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(2)

 

III

 

51

 

Director, Chairperson of the

Board

 

2006

 

2020

 

 

 

Raymond Huggenberger

 

III

 

60

 

Director

 

2008

 

2020

 

 

 

R. Scott Greer(1)

 

I

 

60

 

Director, Chairperson of the

Audit Committee

 

2015

 

2021

 

 

 

Heather Rider(2)

 

I

 

59

 

Director, Chairperson of the Compensation, Nominating

and Governance Committee

 

2014

 

2021

 

 

 

Scott Beardsley(2)

 

I

 

51

 

Director

 

2017

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

of term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

 

term

 

for which

 

Name

 

Class

 

Age

 

Position(s)

 

since

 

expires

 

nominated

 

1.  Directors with terms expiring

     at the Annual Meeting/nominees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin King(1)(2)

 

II

 

65

 

Director, Chairperson of the

Compensation Committee

 

2022

 

2022

 

2025

 

Mary Kay Ladone(1)(2)

 

II

 

55

 

Director

 

2022

 

2022

 

2025

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

II

 

56

 

Director, Chief Executive Officer and President

 

2021

 

2022

 

2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  Continuing Directors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glenn Boehnlein(1)

 

III

 

60

 

Director, Chairperson of the Audit

Committee

 

2022

 

2023

 

 

 

Kristen Miranda (3)(4)

 

III

 

60

 

Director

 

2021

 

2023

 

 

 

Elizabeth Mora (3)(4)

 

I

 

61

 

Director, Chairperson of the Board, Chairperson of the Compliance Committee

 

2021

 

2024

 

 

 

Heather Rider (2)(3)

 

I

 

62

 

Director, Chairperson of the Nominating and

Governance Committee

 

2014

 

2024

 

 

 

 

(1)

(1)  Member of our Audit Committee  

(2)  Member of our Compensation Committee

(3)  Member of our Nominating and Governance Committee

(4)  Member of our Compliance Committee

(2)

Member of our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee  

Nominees for Director

Loren McFarland

Kevin King has served on our Board and as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee since March 2022.  He has over three decades of experience in the healthcare and IT industries in leadership roles. Mr. King previously served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: IRTC) from July 2012 to January 2021 and continues to serve on iRhythm’s board of directors. Prior to iRhythm, Mr. King served in multiple leadership positions at Affymetrix, Inc., a publicly traded genetic analysis technology company, beginning as President of Life Sciences Business and Executive Vice President from January 2007 until September 2007, President from September 2007 until January 2009, and President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors from January 2009 until June 2011. Prior to Affymetrix, from February 2005 until June 2006, Mr. King served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Thomson Healthcare, an information services business. From March 1997 until November 2004, Mr. King was a senior executive at GE Healthcare, where he led several business units including Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Global Clinical Systems Business. Mr. King holds a B.A. in Economics and Biology from the University of Massachusetts and an M.B.A. from New Hampshire College. The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of his leadership experience and his extensive industry experience.

-9-


Mary Katherine (Mary Kay) Ladone has served on our Board since March 2022.  Ms. Ladone served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Strategy and Investor Relations, of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., a medical technology company, from December 2018 until January 2022 and previously served as Vice President, Investor Relations, of Hill-Rom from July 2016 to December 2018. Prior to Hill-Rom, from July 2015 until July 2016, Ms. Ladone served as Senior Vice President, Investor Relations Officer of Baxalta Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to Baxalta, Ms. Ladone served in a variety of senior finance, business development and investor relations roles for Baxter International, Inc from 1998 until July 2015. Ms. Ladone currently serves on the board of directors of  Bioventus, Inc. (NASDAQ: BVS), a biotechnology company. Ms. Ladone holds a Bachelor’s in Business Administration from University of Notre Dame. The Board believes that she is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of her leadership experience and her extensive industry and investor relations experience.

Nabil Shabshabhas served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and a Membermember of our Board since 2013.  He has been President and Managing Member of Santa Barbara Financial Services, LLC since 2008.February 2021. Prior to founding Santa Barbara Financial Services, hejoining Inogen, Mr. Shabshab served as Worldwide President of Diabetes Care and Digital Health at Becton Dickinson and Company, a leading medical technology company, from August 2017 to February 2021. Prior to that, since August 2011, Mr. Shabshab served as Becton Dickinson’s Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning. Prior to Becton Dickinson, Mr. Shabshab served as EVP, Global Portfolio, Chief Marketing Officer and Head of RD&E of Diversey, Inc., a cleaning and sanitation solutions company from 2006 to 2010. In his previous roles Mr. Shabshab served as Principal with The Zyman Group, as Vice President, Client Solutions and Consulting with Symphony IRI, and in various sales and marketing roles in pharmaceutical and consumer goods companies including Warner Lambert / Pfizer, the Coca-Cola Company, and Fronterra. Mr. Shabshab holds an MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management and a B.S. in Computer Sciences from American Lebanese University. The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen due to his extensive industry and leadership experience.  

Continuing Directors

Glenn Boehnlein has served on our Board and as Chairperson of the Audit Committee since March 2022.  He has served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Stryker Corporation (NYSE: SYK), a medical devices company since January 2016. Prior to serving as CFO, Mr. Boehnlein served in multiple leadership positions at Stryker, including Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerVice President of Mentor Corporation, a medical equipment company,the MedSurg and Neurotechnology Group from 2004 to 2007.  Prior to that, Mr. McFarland fulfilled various financeJanuary 2011 until December 2015 and accounting roles at Mentor from 1985 to 2004.  He worked as a Certified Public Accountant and Audit Supervisor with Touche Ross & Co., an accounting firm, from 1981 to 1985 and served in the North Dakota Army National Guard from 1978 to 1984.  He currently serves on the Board of Directors and as the Chief Financial Officer of Cure Medical, LLC,the Endoscopy Division from January 2003 until December 2010. Prior to Stryker, from 2000 until January 2003, Mr. Boehnlein served as Chief Financial Officer of MyPrimeTime, a privately held manufacturer of disposable urology products, on the Board of Directors of the MIT Enterprise Forum of the Central Coastmedia company. Prior to MyPrimeTime, Mr. Boehnlein was a partner and chairs the parish finance council for St. Mark’scertified public accountant at Arthur Andersen LLP, an accounting firm. Mr. Boehnlein holds a Bachelor’s in Accountancy and Master’s in Professional Accountancy from Mississippi State University Parish, Isla Vista, CA.  Previously, Mr. McFarland served on the Board of Directors of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc., an acquired publicly-traded medical device company, as the Financial Expert on the Audit Committee and as a Member of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee.  Mr. McFarland has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting from the University of North Dakota and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.  He completed an ISS Director Certification Program in October 2008 at the University of California, Los Angeles’ Anderson School.  .The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of his leadership experience and his extensive experience in finance and accounting.

-9-


Kristen MirandaBenjamin Anderson-Rayhas served as a Member ofon our Board since 2013.  He has been a Partner and Advisor with Trinitas Advisors, a consulting firm,February 2021. She currently serves as Aetna’s West Region President since 2009.2017. Prior to joining Trinitas Advisors, heAetna, she served as the Chief ExecutiveIntegration Officer of three manufacturing companies: Hubbardton Forge, LLCfor Agilon Health from 20082016 to 2009, Chromcraft Revington, Inc. from 2005 to 20082017, and Gravograph New Hermes from 2002 to 2004.  Prior to that, Mr. Anderson-Ray heldin various senior leadership roles for Blue Shield of California from 2006 to 2016 including Senior Vice President, Strategic Partnerships and Innovation as well as Vice President, Provider Network Management. Prior to that, Ms. Miranda held leadership roles at Sunrise Medical, Inc., a global manufacturer and distributor of durable medical equipment,various healthcare firms including President of the Global Business Group in 2001, President of the Continuing Care GroupWellpoint from 2003 to 2006, CIGNA from 1998 to 2000, and President of the Mobility Products Division2003, Health Net from 19961995 to 2001.  Earlier in his career, Mr. Anderson-Ray held management and marketing roles at GE Lighting, a lighting solutions company, from 1984 to 1993, Black & Decker Home Products, a product manufacturing company,1998, Dignity Health from 1993 to 1994,1995, and Rubbermaid Home Products,First Health from 1989 to 1993. Ms. Miranda has a manufacturer and distributor of household items, from 1994 to 1996.  He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Sommetrics, Inc. Mr. Anderson-Ray has Bachelor of Art and Science degreesArts degree in Marketing and Horticulture from Michigan State University and an M.B.A.Anthropology from the University of Michigan.California, Davis. The Board believes that heshe is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of hisher leadership experience and hisher extensive industryhealthcare experience.

Scott WilkinsonElizabeth Mora  has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since March 1, 2017, and a Member of our Board since January 1, 2017.  Previously, he served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017, and our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing from 2008 through December 31, 2015, and in this role he oversaw Inogen’s global operations in sales, marketing, customer service, product management, medical billing, and clinical services.  Prior to that, he served as our Director of Product Management from 2005 to 2006 and Vice President, Product Management from 2006 to 2008.  From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Wilkinson worked for Invacare Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of oxygen products, as a Group Product Manager and helped launch their $100 million oxygen product line segment.  From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Wilkinson served as a Product Line Director with Johnson & Johnson, a healthcare company.  From 1988 to 1999, Mr. Wilkinson worked as a Research Scientist, Product Manager, and Project Leader at Kimberly Clark, a consumer products company.  Mr. Wilkinson received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron and an M.B.A. from University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh.  The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen due to his considerable knowledge and understanding of our business together with his extensive industry experience.

Continuing Directors

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. has served as Chairperson of our Board and Chairperson of the Compliance Committee since 2008,December 2021 and as a director since 2006.  Dr. Lukatch is employed as a Partner and Managing Director at TPG Biotech. Dr. Lukatch joined TPG Biotech in 2015. Prior to joining TPG Biotech, Dr. Lukatch was a Partner at Novo Ventures (US) Inc., which provides certain consultancy services to Novo Holdings A/S. Dr. Lukatch joined Novo Ventures (US) Inc. in 2006.  From 2001 to 2006, Dr. Lukatch was a Managing Director responsible for biotechnology venture investments at Piper Jaffray Ventures and SightLine Partners, a private equity firm and spin off of Piper Jaffray Ventures.  Prior to joining Piper Jaffray Ventures, Dr. Lukatch worked as a strategy consultant with McKinsey & Company, a consulting firm, from 1997 to 2000.  Dr. Lukatch also served as co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of AutoMate Scientific, a biotechnology instrumentation company from 1991 to 1997, and held scientific positions with Chiron Corporation, a biotechnology company, from 1990 to 1991, Roche Bioscience, a healthcare company, from 1996 to 1997, and Cetus Corporation, a biotechnology company, in 1987.  He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Adynxx, Ceribell, Engage Therapeutics, Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (FLXN), Halo Neuroscience, Satsuma Pharma, SutroVax, Viacyte and ViewPoint Therapeutics. Dr. Lukatch received his Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University where he was a DOD USAF Fellow, and his Bachelor of Arts in Biochemistry from the University of California at Berkeley.  The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of his extensive industry experience and experience as a venture capital investor and a board member for several venture-backed healthcare companies.

Raymond Huggenberger has served as a Member of our Board since 2008.  Mr. HuggenbergerMay 2021. Ms. Mora previously served as our Chief ExecutiveAdministrative Officer, Vice President for Finance, Administration and Treasurer at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory from 2008 until March 1, 2017 and as our Presidentto 2020. Previously, Ms. Mora served in a variety of leadership roles at Harvard University from 1997 to 2008, until January 1, 2016.  Prior to joining our company, Mr. Huggenberger held various management positions with Sunrise Medical Inc., a global manufacturer and distributor of durable medical equipment, including: Vice President of Marketing for Sunrise’s German subsidiary from 1994 to 1996, President of Sunrise’s German division from 1998 until 2000, President of the European Operating Group from 2000 to 2002, President and Chief Operating Officer from 2002 until 2004, and President of European Operations 2006 to 2007.  Mr. Huggenberger also held a consultant position with McDermott and Bull Inc., an

-10-


executive search firm, from 2005 to 2006 and the position of Managing Director in the healthcare division of TA Triumph Adler AG, a document process management firm, from 1996 to 1998.  Mr. Huggenberger currently serves on the Board of Directors of Wellfount Corporation, a pharmacy services company. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Tactile Systems Technology Inc., a publicly-traded company (TCMD), Clarify Medical Inc., Ebb Therapeutics, and Sommetrics, Inc., which are all medical device companies. Mr. Huggenberger graduated from AKAD University in Rendsburg, Germany in Economics and completed the Advanced Marketing Strategies Program at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.  The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of his deep understanding of our business, operations and strategy and extensive executive and director roles with healthcare companies.

R. Scott Greer has served as a Member of our Board since August 2015 and Chairperson of the Audit Committee since January 1, 2018.  Since June 2003, Mr. Greer has served as Managing Director of Numenor Ventures, LLC, a venture capital firm. In 1996, Mr. Greer co-founded Abgenix, Inc., a company that specialized in the discovery, development and manufacture of human therapeutic antibodies, and from June 1996 through May 2002, he served as its Chief Executive Officer. He also served on the Board of Directors of Abgenix from 1996 and Chairman of the Board of Directors from 2000 until the acquisition of Abgenix by Amgen, Inc. in April 2006. Prior to Abgenix’s formation, Mr. Greer held senior management positions at Cell Genesys, Inc., a biotechnology company, initiallyincluding as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Corporate Developmentfor Finance, Associate Vice President, Research Administration, and laterDirector,

-10-


Office for Sponsored Research. Prior to that, Ms. Mora served at Coopers and Lybrand LLP (PricewaterhouseCoopers) as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development,Manager, from 1992 to 1997 and various positions at Genetics Institute, Inc., a biotechnology researchas an Audit Senior and development company. Mr. GreerManager, from 1989 to 1992. Since 2017, Ms. Mora has served as an advisory board member for Cambridge Bancorp (NASDAQ: CATC). Ms. Mora currently serves as a Memberon the board of the Boarddirectors of Directors of Nektar Therapeutics, a publicly-traded biopharmaceutical company (NKTR). Mr. GreerMKS Instruments (NASDAQ: MKSI), Limoneira Company (NASDAQ: LMNR) and Everest Consolidator LLC. Ms. Mora holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Whitman Collegethe University of California, Berkeley, and an M.B.A.MBA from Harvard University. He also was a Certified Public Accountant. Simmons College. Ms. Mora holds an active CPA license in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Board believes that heshe is qualified to serve as a directorChairperson of Inogen because of hisher extensive experience as an accountantin finance and as an executiveaccounting and director of various public and private biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies.

Heather Rider has served as a Member of our Board since 2014 and is currently Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee and Member of the Compensation Committee since October 2020. Ms. Rider also served as Chairperson of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee sincefrom January 1, 2018.2018 to September 30, 2020 and Chairperson of the Compensation Committee from October 1, 2020 until March 23, 2021. From 2012 to 2013, Ms. Rider served as Vice President, Global Human Resources of Cymer, Inc., a publicly-tradedpublicly traded supplier of light sources for semiconductor manufacturing that was acquired by ASML Holding NV in 2013.  From October 2010 to September 2012, Ms. Rider served as Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources of Alphatec Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded medical device company focused on surgical treatment of spine disorders, and from 2006 to 2010, she served as Vice President, Human Resources of Intuitive Surgical, Inc., a publicly-traded manufacturer of robotic surgical systems. From 2001 to 2005, Ms. Rider served as Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources of Sunrise Medical, Inc., a global manufacturer and distributor of durable medical equipment. From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Rider served as Vice President of Human Resources of Biosense Webster, a member of the Johnson & Johnson family of companies, and a medical device manufacturer of intracardiac catheters and location technology. Prior to 1998, Ms. Rider served as Head of Human Resources for City of Hope, a leading research and treatment center for cancer, diabetes and other life-threatening diseases, CAP/MPT, a medical malpractice provider for physicians in California and medical malpractice insurance for large physician groups and hospitals, and Environmental Diagnostics International, a bio-diagnostics company with focus on the detection of environmental compounds and diseases using monoclonal antibody technology. Ms. Rider currently serves on the Board of Directors of Intricon Corporation, a medical technology company.  Ms. Rider holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from Claremont McKenna College and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University. The Board believes that she is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen because of her extensive executive-level experience with healthcare and life science companies.

Scott A. Beardsley has served as a Member of our Board since January 1, 2017.  Mr. Beardsley is employed as a Managing Partner by Novo Ventures (US), Inc., which provides certain financial investment consultancy services to Novo Holdings A/S, a Danish limited liability company that manages investments and financial assets. Mr. Beardsley has worked within Novo Holdings A/S and its investment activities since 2009 in several roles: since January 2018, Mr. Beardsley has been employed by Novo Ventures (US) Inc. as a Managing Partner; from 2016 through 2017, he was employed as a Senior Partner by Novo Ventures (US) Inc.; from December 2012 through 2015, he was employed as a Partner by Novo Ventures (US) Inc.; and from 2009 through 2012, he was employed as a Senior Partner by Novo Holdings A/S. Prior to joining Novo Holdings A/S, Mr. Beardsley was a Managing Director in the Health Care Group at J.P. Morgan, a banking and financial services company, from 2006 through 2008, and a Managing Director in the Health Care Group of US Bancorp Piper Jaffray, an investment bank, from 2001 to 2006. Previously, Mr. Beardsley was an investment banker at US Bancorp, Piper Jaffray, Montgomery Securities, an investment bank, and Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated, an investment bank. Mr. Beardsley currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Unchained

-11-


Labs, a life sciences tools company. Mr. Beardsley received his M.B.A. from the Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA and his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Colorado State University. The Board believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of Inogen due to his extensive financial experience and his experience as a venture capital investor and investment banker in the life sciences industry.

Director Independence

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.  Under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s Board of Directors. In addition, the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee be independent. Under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s Board of Directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our Board has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Board has determined that none of Mr. Anderson-Ray, Mr. McFarland, Mr. Greer, Dr. Lukatch,Ms. Mora, Ms. Rider, Mr. Boehnlein, Mr. King, Ms. Ladone, and Mr. Beardsley,Ms. Miranda, representing six of our eightseven directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our Board also determined that Mr. GreerBoehnlein (Chairperson), Mr. McFarlandKing and Mr. Anderson-Ray,Ms. Ladone, who comprise our Audit Committee,Committee; Mr. King (Chairperson), Ms. Rider and Ms. Ladone, who comprise our Compensation Committee; Ms. Rider (Chairperson), Dr. LukatchMs. Miranda and Mr. Beardsley,Ms. Mora, who comprise our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

-11-


In making this determination, our Board considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

Board Leadership Structure

Dr. LukatchOur corporate governance principles require that the positions of chairperson of the Board and Chief Executive Officer must be held by separate persons and that the chairperson of our Board must be independent, as determined in accordance with the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Ms. Mora currently serves as the chairperson of our Board.  Our Board believes the current board leadership structure provides effective independent oversight of management while allowing our Board and management to benefit from Dr. Lukatch’sMs. Mora’s leadership and years of experience as a venture capital investor in the biotech industry.  Dr. Lukatchmanaging large and complex organizations and that Ms. Mora is best positioned to identify strategic priorities, lead critical discussion and execute our strategy and business plans.  Dr. LukatchMs. Mora possesses detailed in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities, and challenges facing us. Independent directors and management sometimes have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our Board believes that Dr. Lukatch’sMs. Mora’s role enables strong leadership with a focus on diversity and inclusion, creates clear accountability, facilitates information flow between management and our Board, and enhances our ability to communicate our message and strategy clearly and consistently to stockholders.

Board Diversity

Inogen embraces our Board’s diversity of background, experience, culture, and other characteristics that make the Board unique. Diversity at the top sets the expectation for inclusion throughout the organization.  As a result, we are disclosing specific diversity-related metrics, including self-identified sex, race, and sexual orientation.  The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) defines an “underrepresented minority” as an individual who self-identifies in one or more of the following groups:  Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander or Two or More Races or Ethnicities. The EEOC defines a “LGBTQ+” as an individual who self-identifies in one or more of the following groups:  lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning in regard to their sexual orientation. Four of the seven board directors self-identified with one or more diversity characteristic. The following table sets forth certain self-identified diversity information for our directors as of April 11, 2022:

Board Diversity Matrix

Board Size

 

Total number of directors

7

 

Part I: Gender Identity

Male

 

Female

 

Non-Binary

 

Did Not Disclose Gender

 

Number of directors based on gender identity

3

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

Part II: Demographic Background

 

African American or Black

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hispanic or Latinx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

 

3

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board Meetings and Committees

During 2018,2021, our Board held sixnine meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board during the periods that he or she served on the Board and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our Board on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.served on such committee.

-12-


It is the policy of our Board to regularly have separate meeting times for independent directors without management.  Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at Annual Meetings of Stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. All eightFour members of our Board at the time of the Annual Meeting attended our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

-12-


We have established an Audit Committee, and a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee, and, effective July 28, 2021, a Compliance Committee.

We believe that the composition of these committees meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of these committees complycomplies with the requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to comply with the requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market with respect to committee composition of independent directors.  Each committee has the composition and responsibilities described below.

Audit Committee

The members of our Audit Committee are Mr. GreerBoehnlein (Chairperson), Mr. McFarlandMs. Ladone and Mr. Anderson-Ray,King, each of whom is a non-employee member of our Board.  Each of Mr. Boehnlein, Ms. Ladone and Mr. King were appointed to the Audit Committee in connection with their appointment to the Board in March 2022. Prior to the appointment of Mr. Boehnlein, Ms. Ladone and Mr. King to the Audit Committee in March 2022, the members of our Audit Committee were former director Loren McFarland, former director Benjamin Anderson-Ray, and Elizabeth Mora. Ms. Mora was appointed to the Audit Committee upon her appointment to the Board in May 2021. Former director R. Scott Greer previously served on the Audit Committee until his resignation in May 2021. The composition of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ Global Select Market listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our Audit Committee also meets the financial literacy requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market listing standards. Our Audit Committee Chairperson, Mr. Greer, isBoehnlein, and Audit Committee member Ms. Ladone are our Audit Committee financial expert,experts, as that term is defined under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and each of Mr. Boehnlein and Ms. Ladone possesses financial sophistication, as defined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process and assists our Board in monitoring our financial systems. Our Audit Committee also:

approves the hiring, discharging and compensation of our independent auditors;

oversees the work of our independent auditors;

approves engagements of the independent auditors to render any audit or permissible non-audit services;

reviews the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditors;

reviews our financial statements and our critical accounting policies and estimates;

oversees risk management matters;

oversees our internal audit function;function (or other personnel or service providers responsible for the internal audit function (if any));

reviews the submission and treatment of complaints to the whistle-blower hotline of suspected violations regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, harassment, fraud and policy violations;

reviews our legal and ethical compliance programs;

reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls; and

reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditors the results of our annual audit, our annual and quarterly financial statements and our publicly filed reports.

-13-


Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. A copy of the charter of our Audit Committee is available on our website at www.inogen.com in the Corporate Overview – Governance Documents section of our Investors webpage.https://investor.inogen.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents.  During 2018,2021, our Audit Committee held eleveneight meetings.

Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee are Mr. King (Chairperson), Ms. Rider (Chairperson), Dr. Lukatch and Ms. Ladone. Each of Mr. Beardsley.King and Ms. Ladone were appointed to the Compensation Committee in connection with their appointment to the Board in March 2022. Prior to the appointment of Mr. King and Ms. Ladone to the Compensation Committee in March 2022, the members of our Compensation Committee were Ms. Rider, former director Loren McFarland and former director Heath Lukatch. Mr. McFarland was appointed to the Compensation Committee in January 2022 and served on the committee until his resignation from the Board in March 2022.  Ms. Miranda was appointed to the Compensation Committee in connection with her appointment to the Board in March 2021 and served on the Compensation Committee from the time of her appointment until January 2022. The composition of our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ Global Select Market listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our compensation policies, plans and benefits programs. Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee also:

assists the Board in providing oversight of the Company’s overall compensation plans and benefits programs;

-13-


reviews and approves, or makes recommendations for approval by the independent members of the Board regarding corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our chief executive officer and other senior officers;

reviews and approves, or makes recommendations for approval by the independent members of the Board regarding corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our chief executive officer and other senior officers;

evaluates the performance of our officers in light of established goals and objectives;

reviews and approves, or makes recommendations regarding compensation of our chief executive officer and other senior officers based on its evaluations;

administers the issuance of equity awards under our stock plans;

evaluates and makes recommendations regarding the organization, governance and remuneration of our Board and its committees;

evaluates and proposes nominees for election to our Board;

assesses the performance of members of our Board and makes recommendations regarding committee and chairperson assignments;

recommends desired qualifications for our Board membership and conducts searches for potential members of our Board; and

reviewsseeks to structure our compensation plans, policies and makes recommendations withrespectprograms in order to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, provide incentives for such persons to perform to the best of their abilities, maintain appropriate levels of risk and reward and promote the success of our corporate governance guidelines.business.

Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of NASDAQ Global Select Market. A copy of the charter of our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee is available on our website at www.inogen.com in the Corporate Overview - Governance Documents section of our Investors webpage.https://investor.inogen.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. During 2018,2021, our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee held twoeight meetings.

The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee regularly reviews the services provided by its outside consultants and believes that Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services.  The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee conducted a review of its relationship with Pearl Meyer in 2018, and determined that Pearl Meyer’s work for the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest, consistent with the guidance provided under the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC and NASDAQ Global Select Market.

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee continues to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on a periodic basis.

-14-


Compensation,Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of our Nominating and Governance Committee are Ms. Rider (Chairperson), Ms. Miranda and Ms. Mora. Ms. Miranda was appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee in January 2022. Ms. Mora was appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee in March 2022 in connection with the resignation of former director Loren McFarland. Mr. McFarland was appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee in July 2021 and served on the committee until his resignation from the Board in March 2022. Former director Benjamin Anderson-Ray served on the Nominating and Governance Committee until January 2022. The composition of our Nominating and Governance Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ Global Select Market listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Our Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our plans and benefits programs. Our Nominating and Governance Committee also:

assists the Board in identifying prospective director nominees and recommends to the Board the director nominees for each annual meeting of stockholders;

evaluates independence of directors and director nominees;

recommends to the Board members for each Board committee;

ensures that the Board is properly constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to Inogen and our stockholders;

ensures that we follow appropriate governance standards and implements appropriate internal corporate governance policies;

develops and recommends to the Board governance principles applicable to us;

oversees our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) programs;

oversees the evaluation of the Board and management;

oversees director orientation and continuing education; and

reviews the Company’s succession planning process.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. A copy of the charter of our Nominating and Governance Committee is available on our website at https://investor.inogen.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. During 2021, our Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings.

Compliance Committee

The Compliance Committee was established effective July 28, 2021. The current members of our Compliance Committee are Ms. Mora (Chairperson), Ms. Miranda and Mr. Boehnlein. Mr. Boehnlein was appointed to the Compliance Committee in April 2022. Former director Raymond Huggenberger served on the Compliance Committee until his resignation from the Board in December 2021. Former director Benjamin Anderson-Ray served on the Compliance Committee from January 2022 until his resignation from the Board in March 2022. Our Compliance Committee oversees our compliance with healthcare, legal and regulatory requirements. Our Compliance Committee also:

oversees compliance programs in the healthcare, legal and regulatory areas, and other legal and regulatory requirements not overseen by the Audit Committee;

provides an avenue of communication among management, those persons responsible for internal compliance functions in these areas, and the Board; and

oversees corporate responsibility matters of the Company not overseen by the Audit Committee.

Our Compliance Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. During 2021, our Compliance Committee held three meetings.

-15-


Compensation Committee Interlocks

None of the members of our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee (which(which includes Mr. King, Ms. Rider, Dr.and Ms. Ladone) and none of the members of our Compensation Committee that served during the past year (which included Ms. Miranda and former directors Heath Lukatch and Mr. Beardsley) isLoren McFarland) are or hashave at any time during the past year been an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executiveExecutive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our Board or our current Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will use the following procedures to identify and evaluate any individual recommended or offered for nomination to the Board:

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended to the Committee from other sources.

-14-In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the following:


In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the following:

 

the current size and composition of the Board and the needs of the Board and the respective committees of the Board;

 

such factors as character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like.  The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates these factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of these factors; and

 

other factors that the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee deems appropriate.

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. Inogen does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity on the Board; however, our Board and the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is essential that members of our Board represent diverse viewpoints.

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee requires the following minimum qualifications to be satisfied by any nominee for a position on the Board:

the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity;

proven achievement and competence in the nominee’s field and the ability to exercise sound business judgment;

skills that are complementary to those of the existing Board;

the ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company’s success; and

an understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that is required of a member of the Board and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently carry out those responsibilities.

If the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee determines that an additional or replacement director is required, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a director candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person or persons making the recommendation or nomination, engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board or management.

The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee may propose to the Board a candidate recommended or offered for nomination by a stockholder as a nominee for election to the Board.

-16-


Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board

It is the policy of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board to consider recommendations for candidates to the Board from stockholders holding no less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least twelve (12) months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation or nomination.

A stockholder that wants to recommend a candidate for election to the Board should direct the recommendation in writing by letter to the Company, attention of the Corporate Secretary, at 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, CA 93117. The recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of Company stock. Such recommendations must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for Board membership, including issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like and personal references.

-15-


A stockholder that instead desires to nominate a person directly for election to the Board at an Annual Meeting of the Stockholders must meet the deadlines and other requirements set forth in Section 2.4 of the Company’s Bylaws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Section 2.4 of the Company’s Bylaws requires that a stockholder who seeks to nominate a candidate for director must provide a written notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company not later than the 45th day nor earlier than the 75th day before the one-year anniversary of the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting; provided, however, that in the event that no Annual Meeting was held in the previous year or if the date of the Annual Meeting is advanced by more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary of the date of the previous year’s Annual Meeting, then notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such Annual Meeting and (ii) the 10th day following the day on which Public Announcement (as defined below) of the date of such Annual Meeting is first made. That notice must state the information required by Section 2.4 of the Company’s Bylaws, and otherwise must comply with applicable federal and state law. The Corporate Secretary of the Company will provide a copy of the Bylaws upon request in writing from a stockholder.  “Public Announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or a comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor thereto.

Communications with the Board

The Board believes that management speaks for the Company. Individual Board members may, from time to time, communicate with various constituencies that are involved with the Company, but it is expected that Board members would do this with knowledge of management and, in most instances, only at the request of management.

In cases where stockholders and other interested parties wish to communicate directly with our non-management directors, messages can be sent to our Corporate Secretary, at Inogen, Inc., 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, California 93117, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Our Corporate Secretary monitors these communications and will provide a summary of all received messages to the Board at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. Our Board generally meets on a quarterly basis. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our Corporate Secretary may determine, in his or her judgment, to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the Board or non-management director, of independent advisors or of Company management, as our Corporate Secretary considers appropriate.

Our Corporate Secretary may decide in the exercise of his or her judgment whether a response to any stockholder or interested party communication is necessary.

-17-


This procedure for stockholder and other interested party communications with the non-management directors is administered by the Company’s Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee. This procedure does not apply to (a) communications to non-management directors from officers or directors of the Company who are stockholders, (b) stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or (c) communications to the Audit Committee pursuant to the Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters.

Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Ethics and Conduct

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles. These principles address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general.It is our policy that the positions of Chairman and CEO must be held by separate persons and the Chairman must be independent as defined in the applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. In addition, our Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Principles and our Code of Ethics and Conduct is posted on our website at www.inogen.com in the Corporate Overview – Governance Documents section of our Investors webpage.https://investor.inogen.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents.  We intend to post any amendments to our Code of Ethics and Conduct, and any waivers of our Code of Ethics and Conduct for directors and executive officers, on the same website.

-16-


Risk Management

Risk is inherent with every business, and we face a number of risks, including strategic, financial, business and operational, legal and compliance, and reputational. We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our operations. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks the Company faces, while our Board, as a whole and assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are appropriate and functioning as designed.

Our Board believes that open communication between management and our Board is essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our Board meets with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of the senior management team at quarterly meetings of our Board as well as at such other times as they deem appropriate, where, among other topics, they discuss strategy and risks facing the Company.

While our Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, our Board committees assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. Our Audit Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, legal, and regulatory compliance, and discusses with management and the independent auditor guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our Audit Committee also reviews our major financial risk exposures, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. In addition, our Audit Committee monitors certain key risks on a regular basis throughout the fiscal year, such as risk associated with internal control over financial reporting and liquidity risk. Our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risk associated with Board organization, membership and structure, ESG reporting, and corporate governance. Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee also oversees risks related to our compensation policies to ensure that our compensation programs do not encourage unnecessary risk-taking. Our Compliance Committee oversees regulatory compliance areas. Finally, our full Board reviews strategic and operational risk in the context of reports from the management team, receives reports on all significant committee activities at each regular meeting, and evaluates the risks inherent in significant transactions.

-18-


Director Compensation

In October 2017, our Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, and2019, after reviewing data provided by Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) regarding practices at comparable companies amended the non-employee director compensation program as set forth below, which became effective on January 1, 2018. The previous policy provided for stock options grants to non-employee directors upon their first becoming a director and annual option grants at subsequent annual meetings of stockholders based on a fixed number of shares. Inin consultation with Pearl Meyer, our Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, determined it was necessary and appropriate to implement changes to theour non-employee director compensation policy to, among other purposes, ensure that equity compensation for our non-employee directors is competitive, better alignlevels at the compensation of our non-employee directors with stewardship and oversight responsibility, minimize the variability of equity grant values due to stock price fluctuation that arose under the previous policy, and ensure that we offer appropriate incentives for continued service as a director or, for prospective directors, to join our Board.time. In making these amendments,this determination, the Board and the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee considered the midpoint range of our compensation peer group (as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section below) as a general guideline for the appropriate level of cash and equity compensation but did not attempt to benchmark cash or equity compensation to any specific percentile.In October 2021, our Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Pearl Meyer, reviewed our non-employee director compensation program and determined that no changes were necessary.

In September 2020, our Board restructured our non-employee director compensation program to align with the newly separated Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, and in July 2021, our Board restructured our non-employee director compensation program to include compensation for service on the Compliance Committee (without making any changes to the compensation for service on the Board or any other committees). In each case, our Board reviewed data provided by our independent compensation consulting firm, Pearl Meyer, in setting compensation for such committees.

Also in October 2019, our Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, adopted Equity Ownership Guidelines, applicable to our non-employee directors who receive compensation from us, executive officers, and other senior level employees. A more detailed description of these guidelines is provided in the “Equity Ownership Guidelines” section of this proxy statement below. In October 2021, our Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Pearl Meyer, reviewed our “Equity Ownership Guidelines” for non-employee directors and determined that no changes were necessary.

Cash Compensation.  All non-employee directors are entitled to receive the following cash compensation for their services:services, effective October 1, 2020 (except in the case of compensation for service as Chairperson of the Compliance Committee or as a member of the Compliance Committee, in which case such compensation was effective July 28, 2021):

$45,000 per year for service as a Board Member;

$75,000 per year for service as Chairperson of the Board;

$20,000 per year for service as Chairperson of the Audit Committee;

-17-


$20,000 per year for service as Chairperson of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee;

$15,000 per year for service as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee;

$10,000 per year for service as Chairperson the Nominating and Governance Committee;

$10,000 per year for service as Chairperson the Compliance Committee;

$10,000 per year for service as a member of the Audit Committee; and

$10,0007,500 per year for service as a member of the Compensation Committee;

$5,000 per year for service as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee; and

$5,000 per year for service as a member of the Compliance Committee.

All cash payments to non-employee directors are paid quarterly in arrears on a pro-rata basis.

Equity Compensation.

Initial Awards: Each non-employee director who first joins us will be granted an initial award of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) covering a number of shares equal to the product of (i) the number of restricted stock unitsRSUs subject to the Annual Award (as defined below) provided to non-employee directors at the last annual meeting of stockholders preceding the date in which such person first becomes a non-employee director (the “Start Date”) multiplied by (ii) a fraction (A) the numerator of which is (x) 12 minus (y) the number of fully completed months between the date of the last annual meeting and the start date and (B) the denominator of which is 12, rounded to the nearest whole share.Each such initial award will vest on the same date as the other Annual Awards that are outstanding as of the grant date, subject to the non-employee director continuing to be a service provider through the applicable vesting date.

-19-


Annual Awards: On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director will automatically be granted an award of restricted stock unitsRSUs covering a number of shares having a grant date fair value of $180,000, rounded down to the nearest whole share (the “Annual Award”). The Annual Award will vest on the earlier of (i) the one-year anniversary of the date the Annual Award is granted or (ii) the day prior to the date of the Annual Meeting following the date the Annual Award is granted, in each case, subject to the non-employee director continuing to be a service provider through the applicable vesting date.

Elections to Receive Restricted Stock UnitsRSUs in Lieu of Cash Compensation: Each non-employee director who serves as Chairperson of our Board may elect to convert all or a portion of his or her cash compensation for service as Chairperson of our Board into an award of restricted stock unitsRSUs covering a number of shares having a grant date fair value equal to the aggregate amount of cash compensation for which the non-employee director submitted an award election, rounded down to the nearest whole share. Such award will be granted on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders and will vest quarterly in equal amounts, subject to the non-employee director continuing to be a service provider through each applicable vesting date.

All awards granted to non-employee directors of our Board are subject to 100% vesting acceleration in connection with a “change in control” pursuant to our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.Plan (the “2014 Plan”).

The table below shows compensation earned by our non-employee directors during 2018.2021. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for their service as a director while they are also employees. During the year ended December 31, 2018, one director,2021, Mr. Wilkinson,Shabshab, served in the role of President and Chief Executive Officer and therefore is treated as a named executive officer.NEO. In addition, former director Scott Wilkinson served in the role of President and Chief Executive Officer for a portion of the year and therefore is also treated as a NEO. The following table excludes each of Mr. Wilkinson.Shabshab and Mr. Wilkinson’sWilkinson as each of their respective compensation is discussedset forth in “Executive Compensation.”the “2021 Summary Compensation Table” below.

-18-


Directors Kevin King, Mary Kay Ladone and Glenn Boehnlein were each appointed to the Board in March 2022, did not serve as directors during any portion of 2021, and are therefore not included in the table below since they did not earn any compensation from us during 2021.

20182021 Director Compensation Table

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

Awards

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

Loren McFarland(3)

 

$

56,250

 

 

$

179,988

 

 

$

236,238

 

Benjamin Anderson-Ray(4)

 

 

53,250

 

 

 

179,988

 

 

 

233,238

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(5)

 

 

116,250

 

 

 

179,988

 

 

 

296,238

 

Heather Rider(6)

 

 

60,250

 

 

 

179,988

 

 

 

240,238

 

R. Scott Greer(7)

 

 

60,750

 

 

 

179,988

 

 

 

240,738

 

Scott Beardsley(8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raymond Huggenberger(9)

 

 

43,750

 

 

 

179,988

 

 

 

223,738

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

Stock

 

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

Awards

 

 

Compensation

 

 

Total

 

Name

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(3)

 

 

127,083

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

307,057

 

Elizabeth Mora(4)

 

 

35,736

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,710

 

Benjamin Anderson-Ray(5)

 

 

65,000

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

244,974

 

Loren McFarland(6)

 

 

63,167

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

243,141

 

Heather Rider(7)

 

 

65,000

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

244,974

 

Raymond Huggenberger(8)

 

 

48,972

 

 

 

179,974

 

 

 

440

 

 

 

228,946

 

Kristen Miranda(9)

 

 

45,889

 

 

 

240,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

286,177

 

R. Scott Greer (10)

 

 

25,819

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,819

 

 

(1)

Cash compensation earned for Board and committee membership is discussed in the “Cash Compensation” sections above.  

(2)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. See the notes to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 20182021 filed with the SEC on February 26, 201925, 2022 for a discussion of assumptions made in determining the grant date fair value and compensation expense of our stock awards.

(3)

As of December 31, 2018, Mr. McFarland2021, Dr. Lukatch had outstanding options to purchase a total of 45,41432,329 shares of our common stock and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs. Dr. Lukatch resigned from the Board on March 22, 2022 and entered into a consulting arrangement with the Company effective following his resignation from the Board.

(4)

As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Anderson-Ray2021, Ms. Mora had outstanding options to purchase a total of 26,000 shares of our common stock and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs.

(5)

As of December 31, 2018, Dr. Lukatch2021, Mr. Anderson-Ray had outstanding options to purchase a total of 32,32926,000 shares of our common stock and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs. Mr. Anderson-Ray resigned from the Board on March 22, 2022 and entered into a consulting arrangement with the Company effective following his resignation from the Board.

(6)

As of December 31, 2018,2021, Mr. McFarland had outstanding options to purchase a total of 37,081 shares of our common stock and 2,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs. Mr. McFarland resigned from the Board on March 22, 2022 and entered into a consulting arrangement with the Company effective following his resignation from the Board.

-20-


(7)

As of December 31, 2021, Ms. Rider had outstanding options to purchase a total of 22,500 shares of our common stock and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs.

(8)

Mr. Huggenberger resigned from the Board effective December 30, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, Mr. Huggenberger had outstanding options to purchase a total of 84,606 shares of our common stock and 2,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs. Mr. Huggenberger resigned from the Board on December 29, 2021 and entered into a consulting arrangement with the Company, effective following his resignation from the Board. The “All Other Compensation” amount represents 3 days of compensation for consulting services in accordance with his consulting agreement. A more detailed description of these services is provided in the “Consulting Agreements with Former Directors” section below.

(9)

As of December 31, 2021, Ms. Miranda had 2,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs.

(7)

As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Greer had outstanding options to purchase a total of 30,000 shares of our common stock and 989 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs.

(8)(10)

Mr. BeardsleyGreer resigned from the Board effective May 24, 2021.  Mr. Greer had no outstanding options or shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs as of December 31, 2018.  Further, he has agreed to waive any right to compensation for service on the Board or any committee thereof.2021.

(9)

As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Huggenberger had outstanding options to purchase a total of 68,411 shares of our common stock and 989 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs.

See “Executive Compensation” for information about the compensation of directors who also were Named Executive OfficersNEOs during 2018.2021.

Consulting Agreements with Former Directors

-19-In connection with Mr. Huggenberger’s resignation from the Board, the Company and Mr. Huggenberger entered into a consulting agreement, effective following Mr. Huggenberger’s resignation from the Board on December 29, 2021 (the “Huggenberger Consulting Agreement”), which provides that Mr. Huggenberger will provide consulting and advisory services to the Company for a period of two (2) years. As consideration for the services to be provided under the Huggenberger Consulting Agreement, the Company will pay Mr. Huggenberger $4,550 per month for the term of the Huggenberger Consulting Agreement and Mr. Huggenberger will continue to vest in his Company equity awards according to their terms for the term of the Huggenberger Consulting Agreement.

In connection with Dr. Lukatch’s resignation from the Board, the Company and Dr. Lukatch entered into a consulting agreement, effective as of March 22, 2022 (the “Lukatch Consulting Agreement”), which provides that Dr. Lukatch will provide consulting and advisory services to the Company for a period of three (3) months. As consideration for the services to be provided under the Lukatch Consulting Agreement, (a) the Company will pay Dr. Lukatch $4,000 per month for the term of the Lukatch Consulting Agreement, (b) each of Dr. Lukatch’s outstanding RSU awards became fully vested as of the agreement date, and (c) the then-unvested portion of each outstanding option held by Dr. Lukatch will remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) eighteen (18) months following the cessation of Dr. Lukatch’s status as a service provider or (ii) the expiration of the term of such option.

In connection with Mr. McFarland’s resignation from the Board, the Company and Mr. McFarland entered into a consulting agreement, effective as of March 22, 2022 (the “McFarland Consulting Agreement”), which provides that Mr. McFarland will provide consulting and advisory services to the Company for a period of three (3) months. As consideration for the services to be provided under the McFarland Consulting Agreement, (a) the Company will pay Mr. McFarland $9,000 per month for the term of the McFarland Consulting Agreement, (b) each of Mr. McFarland’s outstanding RSU awards became fully vested as of the agreement date, and (c) the then-unvested portion of each outstanding option held by Mr. McFarland will remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) eighteen (18) months following the cessation of Mr. McFarland’s status as a service provider or (ii) the expiration of the term of such option.

In connection with Mr. Anderson-Ray’s resignation from the Board, the Company and Mr. Anderson-Ray entered into a consulting agreement, effective as of March 22, 2022 (the “Anderson-Ray Consulting Agreement”), which provides that Mr. Anderson-Ray will provide consulting and advisory services to the Company for a period of one (1) month. As consideration for the services to be provided under the Anderson-Ray Consulting Agreement, (a) the Company paid Mr. Anderson-Ray a single lump sum payment of $23,500, (b) each of Mr. Anderson-Ray’s outstanding RSU awards became fully vested as of the agreement date, and (c) the then-unvested portion of each outstanding option held by Mr. Anderson-Ray will remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) eighteen (18) months following the cessation of Mr. Anderson-Ray’s status as a service provider or (ii) the expiration of the term of such option.

Equity Ownership Guidelines

In addition, we maintain equity ownership guidelines to further align interests of directors and executives with those of our stockholders. The guideline level for non-employee directors is 3x the annual cash retainer for Board service.  A more detailed description of these guidelines is provided in the “Equity Ownership Guidelines” section of this proxy

-21-


 

statement below. While we are still within the transition period for compliance under the guidelines, as of December 31, 2021, the respective ownership levels of all of our non-employee directors exceeded the current guidelines with the exception of Ms. Mora and Ms. Miranda who joined the Board in 2021.

-22-


PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board is currently composed of eightseven members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At the Annual Meeting, three Class II directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of such director’s successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our Board may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our Company.

Nominees

Our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee has recommended, and our Board has approved, Mr. McFarland, Mr. Anderson-Ray,King, Ms. Ladone, and Mr. WilkinsonShabshab as nominees for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Mr. McFarland, Mr. Anderson-Ray,King, Ms. Ladone, and Mr. WilkinsonShabshab will serve as Class II directors until the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is currently a director of our Company. For information concerning the nominees, please see the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote over the Internet or by telephone but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the election of Mr. McFarland, Mr. Anderson-Ray,King, Ms. Ladone, and Mr. Wilkinson.Shabshab. We expect that Mr. McFarland, Mr. Anderson-Ray,King, Ms. Ladone, and Mr. WilkinsonShabshab will accept such nomination. However, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by our Board to fill such vacancy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.

Vote Required

The election of Class II directors requires a plurality of the shares of common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved.  Broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” the election of each of the THREE directors nominated by our board of directors and named in this proxy statement as Class II directors to serve for a three-year term.

 

-20--23-


 

PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit the financial statements of our company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022 and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the ratification of such appointment. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, Deloitte & Touche LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.2022. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements.  However, our Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, such appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the appointment is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022 if our Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Inogen and its stockholders. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present virtually at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she wishes to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to us by Deloitte & Touche LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.  

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Audit fees(1)

 

$

920,000

 

 

$

831,000

 

Audit-related fees(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax fees(3)

 

 

16,000

 

 

 

88,000

 

All other fees(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit fees(1)

 

$

1,081,000

 

 

$

878,000

 

Audit-related fees(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax fees(3)

 

 

 

 

 

95,000

 

All other fees(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total fees

 

$

936,000

 

 

$

919,000

 

 

$

1,081,000

 

 

$

973,000

 

 

(1)

“Audit Fees”fees” for 20182021 and 20172020 consist of fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements for 20172021 and 20182020 by Deloitte & Touche LLP.

(2)

Audit-Related Fees”Audit-related fees” consist of fees billed for professional services for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”

(3)

“Tax Fees”fees” consist of fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4)

“All Other Fees”other fees” consist of fees billed for services other than the services reported in Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees,fees, Audit-related fees, and Tax Fees.  Deloitte & Touche LLP did not bill us for any such services for each of the last two fiscal years.fees.  

Auditor Independence

In 2018,2021, there were no other professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP that would have required our Audit Committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

-21--24-


 

Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, our Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permissible non‑audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair such accounting firm’s independence. All fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.  Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal.  

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022.

-22--25-


 

PROPOSALPROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables stockholders to approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs as disclosed pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’NEOs compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer,NEO, but rather the overall compensation of all of our Named Executive OfficersNEO, and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or our Board. The Say-on-Pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the remainder of the current fiscal year and beyond. Our Board and our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officerNEO compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will endeavor to communicate with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote, consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

We believe that the information provided in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, including the information discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Program Design” beginning on page 31 below, particularly the continued use of performance-based sharesawards in our equity plan, demonstrates that our executive compensation program is designed appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, and other related disclosure.”

Vote Required

 

Approval of named executive officerNEO compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in personvirtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board and our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.NEOs.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

-23--26-


 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in the following Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Inogen, Inc., or the Company, specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

The primary purpose of our Audit Committee is to oversee our financial reporting process on behalf of our Board. The Audit Committee’s functions are more fully described in its charter, which is available on our website at www.inogen.com in the Corporate Overview – Governance Documents section of our Investors webpage.https://investor.inogen.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its charter and the Audit Committee’s performance on an annual basis.

The Audit Committee does not itself prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of our financial statements. Management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements and reporting processes, including our systems of internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and issuing a report thereon.

The Audit Committee also reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP in the annual audit of our financial statements and in assignments unrelated to the audit, reviews and approves the independent registered public accounting firm’s audit and non-audit fees.

The members of the Audit Committee are currently R. Scott Greer Glenn Boehnlein (chairperson), Benjamin Anderson-RayKevin King and Loren McFarland.Mary Kay Ladone. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is an independent director as currently defined in the applicable NASDAQ and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC rules. The Board has also determined that Mr. Greer is anBoehnlein and Ms. Ladone are “audit committee financial expert”experts” as described in applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee provides our Board such information and materials as it may deem necessary to make our Board aware of financial matters requiring the attention of our Board. The Audit Committee reviews our financial disclosures and meets privately, outside the presence of our management, with our independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality and substance of the accounting principles and significant accounting policies, the reasonableness of significant judgments made in connection with the audited financial statements, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee reports on these meetings to our Board.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte & Touche LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its tenure and independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s Audited Financial Statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019.2022. The Board recommends that stockholders ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

 

R. Scott GreerGlenn Boehnlein (Chairperson)

Benjamin Anderson-RayKevin King

Loren McFarlandMary Kay Ladone

 

-24--27-


 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of March 15, 2019.April 11, 2022.  Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our Board and holds office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.  There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position(s)

Scott WilkinsonNabil Shabshab

 

5456

 

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Alison BauerleinKristin Caltrider

 

3754

 

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial

Officer, Corporate Secretary and Corporate Treasurer

Brenton TaylorGeorge Parr

 

3751

 

Executive Vice President, EngineeringChief Commercial Officer

Byron MyersStanislav Glezer

 

3949

 

Executive Vice President, Sales and MarketingChief Technology Officer

Bart Sanford

 

5257

 

Executive Vice President, Operations

Jason Somer

54

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

 

Scott WilkinsonNabil Shabshab has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer, since March 1, 2017,President and a Membermember of our Board since January 1, 2017.  Previously, heFebruary 2021. Prior to joining Inogen, Mr. Shabshab served as ourWorldwide President of Diabetes Care and Chief Operating OfficerDigital Health at Becton Dickinson and Company, a leading medical technology company, from January 1, 2016 throughAugust 2017 to February 28, 2017, and our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing from 2008 through December 31, 2015, and in this role oversaw Inogen’s global operations in sales, marketing, customer service, product management, medical billing, and clinical services.2021.  Prior to that, hesince August 2011, Mr. Shabshab served as our Director of Product Management from 2005 to 2006 and Vice President, Product Management from 2006 to 2008.  From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Wilkinson worked for Invacare Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of oxygen products, as a Group Product Manager and helped launch their $100 million oxygen product line segment.  From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Wilkinson served as a Product Line Director with Johnson & Johnson, a healthcare company.  From 1988 to 1999, Mr. Wilkinson worked as a Research Scientist, Product Manager, and Project Leader at Kimberly Clark, a consumer products company.  Mr. Wilkinson received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron and an M.B.A. from University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh.  

Alison Bauerlein is a co-founder of Inogen and has served as ourBecton Dickinson’s Chief FinancialMarketing Officer since 2009 and Executive Vice President Finance since March 2014.  Ms. Bauerlein has alsoof Strategic Planning. Prior to Becton Dickinson, Mr. Shabshab served as Corporate SecretaryEVP, Global Portfolio, Chief Marketing Officer and Corporate Treasurer since 2002.  Ms. Bauerlein previouslyHead of RD&E of Diversey, Inc., a cleaning and sanitation solutions company from 2006 to 2010. In his previous roles Mr. Shabshab served as ourPrincipal with The Zyman Group, as Vice President, FinanceClient Solutions and Consulting with Symphony IRI, and in various sales and marketing roles in pharmaceutical and consumer goods companies including Warner Lambert / Pfizer, the Coca-Cola Company, and Fronterra. Mr. Shabshab holds an MBA from 2008 until March 2014.  Prior to servingNorthwestern University Kellogg School of Management and a B.S. in these positions, Ms. Bauerlein also served as Controller with our companyComputer Sciences from 2008 to 2009 and 2001 to 2004, and the Director of Financial Planning and Analysis from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Bauerlein has over 15 years’ experience in treasury, finance, accounting, risk management as well as strategic and tactical cost analysis and forecasting. Ms. Bauerlein received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics/Mathematics with high honors from the University of California, Santa Barbara.American Lebanese University.  

Brenton TaylorKristin Caltrider is a co-founder of Inogen and has served as our Executive Vice President, EngineeringChief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer since March 2022.  Ms. Caltrider previously served as the Vice President of Finance at Quidel Corporation, a manufacturer of medical diagnostic products, since June 2014. Prior to serving in this position, Mr. Taylorher time as Vice President of Finance, Ms. Caltrider held various other roles at Quidel Corporation from May 2007 to June 2014, including Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis, Senior Director of Financial Planning and Analysis, and Director of Financial Planning and Analysis. Prior to Quidel, Ms. Caltrider served as our Vice President, Engineering from 2008 until March 2014 and as thea Director of Technology with ourFinance at Life Technologies Corporation, a biotechnology company, from September 2003 to 2008.  Mr. Taylor is listed as an inventor on 28May 2007. Ms. Caltrider holds a M.B.A. from University of the Company’s issued U.S. patents related to portable oxygen concentrator development.  Mr. Taylor receivedSan Diego and a Bachelor of Science degreeArts in MicrobiologyBusiness Administration from theCalifornia Lutheran University of California, Santa Barbara..

Byron MyersGeorge Parr is a co-founder of Inogen and has served as our Executive Vice President, Sales and MarketingChief Commercial Officer since January 1, 2017. Previously,April 2021. Prior to joining Inogen, Mr. MyersParr served as ourExecutive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer at Becton Dickinson and Company, a leading medical technology company, from 2011November 2017 through January 2020. Previously, from 2014 to 2016. In his current role,2017, Mr. Myers leads Inogen’s Sales,Parr served as Senior Vice President & Chief Marketing and Product Management Operations.Officer at SIRVA Worldwide Relocation & Moving, a moving industry company. Prior to serving in these positions, Mr. Myers held various roles with our company, including: Product Manager from 2002 to 2006, Director of Marketingthat, from 2006 to 20072013, Mr. Parr served at Diversey, Inc., a cleaning and 2008hygiene solutions company, as Senior Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer from 2010 to 2011, International Product2013 and Worldwide General Manager, during 2007,Kitchen Hygiene & Fabric Care from 2006 to 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Parr served in various managing roles in consumer goods companies. Mr. Parr holds an MBA from DePaul University and Director of International Product Managementa B.S. in Accounting from 2007 to 2008. Mr. Myers received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics/Mathematics from the University of California, Santa Barbara and an M.B.A. from the Rady School of Management at the University of California, San Diego.LaSalle University.

-25--28-

 


 

Dr. Stanislav Glezerhas served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer since October 2021 after serving as the Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer from June 2021 to October 2021. Prior to joining Inogen, Dr. Glezer was with Becton Dickinson and Company, a global medical technology company where he served as the Worldwide Vice President of Medical Affairs for Diabetes Care since September 2018. Prior to joining Becton Dickinson, Dr. Glezer served as the Chief Medical Officer at Adocia S.A. a biotechnology company, from 2017 to 2018. From 2016 to 2017, Dr. Glezer served as Vice President of Global Medical Affairs at Novo Nordisk, Inc., a healthcare company. Earlier, Dr. Glezer served in a number of roles of progressively increasing seniority, including, Global Project Head for the largest late-stage pipeline asset, Vice President of Evidence and Value & Access, Vice President of Medical Affairs, and Senior Director of Medical Strategy & Operations, for Sanofi S.A., a multinational pharmaceutical company, from 2001 to 2015. Dr. Glezer holds a Doctor of Medicine from Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry and an MBA from California Coast University.

Bart Sanford has served as our Executive Vice President, Operations since September 2018.  From April 2017 to September 2018, Mr. Sanford was Senior Vice President, Operations, at Cepheid Inc., a molecular diagnostics company. From October 2010 to March 2017, Mr. Sanford was Vice President, Global Operations, at Molecular Devices, LLC, a life sciences company. From January 2009 to September 2010, Mr. Sanford was a Corporate Director at Danaher Corporation, a medical device company. From March 2000 to December 2008, Mr. Sanford held various positions at Fluke Corporation, an industrial test product company, including plant manager, manufacturing manager and materials manager. Mr. Sanford received an M.B.A. from Central Michigan University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Logistics, Materials and Supply Chain Management from Michigan State University.

-26-Jason Somer has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since July 2021. Prior to joining Inogen, Mr. Somer served as head Legal Counsel at Invoca, Inc., a SaaS analytics company. Prior to his time at Invoca, Mr. Somer served as Associate General Counsel at Sunniva, Inc., and as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Innova Gaming Group, a gaming company. Prior to joining Innova, Mr. Somer served as the Senior Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel at Sunora Energy Solutions, a solar energy development company. Mr. Somer also previously served as the Vice President of Special Projects and the Senior Global Counsel at Suntech Power, a Shanghai-based solar energy technology company. Prior to joining Suntech Power, Mr. Somer served as Director of Legal Affairs & Business Development at Ironport Systems, Inc. and as Associate General Counsel and a Business Development Director at Neoforma, Inc. Mr. Somer joined Neoforma from Morrison & Foerster where he was a corporate/securities associate based in New York. Mr. Somer holds a L.L.M. from Boston University, a L.L.B. from the University of British Columbia School of Law, and a B.Sc. from the University of Western Ontario in Biology/Pharmacology.

-29-

 


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the principles underlying the material components of our executive compensation program for our executive officers, including the Named Executive OfficersNEOs, in the “Summary Compensation Table.” We also provide an overview of the overall objectives of the program and the factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions and how we use our executive compensation program to drive our performance.

Our “Named Executive Officers”NEOs for 2018 are:2021 were:

Scott Wilkinson,Nabil Shabshab, Chief Executive Officer, President, and DirectorDirector*

Scott Wilkinson, our former Chief Executive Officer and President, and former Director*

Michael Sergesketter, our former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer*

Alison Bauerlein, our former Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary and Corporate TreasurerTreasurer*

Brenton Taylor,George Parr, Executive Vice President, EngineeringChief Commercial Officer*

Stanislav Glezer, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer*

Bart Sanford, Executive Vice President, Operations

Byron Myers, our former Executive Vice President, Sales and MarketingMarketing*

2021 Management Changes*

2021 was a transition year for us as we had turnover in almost all of the members of management team.  Our 2021 executive compensation programs and decisions reflect this.   The amount and terms of the compensation provided to our new NEOs were set at levels that we believed were important to recruit these highly qualified executives to our company and retain them over the long-term.  As a result, the compensation provided to our NEOs in 2021 is greater in value than what we ordinarily might provide them for a typical year as they include incentives that are designed to compensate these executives for compensation opportunities that they forfeited when leaving their prior employers.

Below is a timeline of our management changes:

On January 22, 2021, our Board appointed Nabil Shabshab to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effective February 8, 2021.  In addition, on January 22, 2021, our Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, appointed Mr. Shabshab to serve as a member of our Board, effective February 8, 2021.  Mr. Shabshab succeeded Mr. Wilkinson, who previously announced that he was retiring from the positions of President, CEO, and as a director.  Mr. Wilkinson’s retirement as an officer and director of the Company became effective February 8, 2021.  In connection with these changes, each of Mr. Shabshab and Mr. Wilkinson entered into an agreement with us, which agreement is described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements Post-Employment Compensation” section below.

On April 2, 2021, Mr. Myers notified us of his intention to resign from his employment with us and entered into a transition agreement with us, which agreement is described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below.  Mr. Myers’ resignation became effective June 4, 2021. 

On April 5, 2021, our Board appointed George Parr to serve as our Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer, effective April 12, 2021.  In connection with his hire, Mr. Parr entered into an agreement with us, which agreement is described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below.

-30-


On June 3, 2021, our Board appointed Stanislav Glezer to serve as our Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer, effective June 21, 2021.  

On October 11, 2021, our Board approved Dr. Glezer’s promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, effective October 11, 2021.  In connection with his promotion, Dr. Glezer entered into agreements with us, which agreements are described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below.

Bart Sanford,On December 10, 2021, our Board appointed Michael K. Sergesketter to serve as our interim Executive Vice President, OperationsChief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective December 13, 2021.  Mr. Sergesketter succeeded Ms. Bauerlein.  In connection with these changes, each of Mr. Sergesketter and Ms. Bauerlein entered into an agreement with us, which agreement is described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below. Ms. Bauerlein’s separation became effective April 1, 2022. 

On March 1, 2022, our Board appointed Kristin Caltrider to serve as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective March 21, 2022.  Ms. Caltrider succeeded Mr. Sergesketter, who, on March 2, 2022, tendered his resignation as an officer effective upon the date Ms. Caltrider commenced employment.  In connection with her hire, Ms. Caltrider entered into an agreement with us, which is described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below.

Executive Summary

2018 wasWe believe we are a yearleader in portable oxygen concentrators and that the market for our technology remains underpenetrated.

We are committed to our purpose of investment for Inogen asimproving lives through respiratory care. We believe we continued to scalecan create long-term shareholder value by focusing on increasing patient and physician awareness of our sales infrastructure primarily associated with our direct-to-consumer strategy. These investments helped us deliver recordproducts, expanding clinical research, growing revenue, and bottom-line results in 2018optimizing our business.  We maintain our belief that the need and helped position Inogenpatient preference for what we believe will be another year of strong revenue growth in 2019. We are executing on our strategic initiatives and remain focused on increasing adoption of our best-in-class portable oxygen concentrators. We also successfully executed on a smooth transition to a new Executive Vice President, Operations.concentrators remains strong.

Our 20182021 executive compensation program and incentive plan targets reflected our objective of building momentum for earnings growth as we continued to utilize performance-based criteria, based on Adjusted Operating Income, in our equity compensation program for our executives so that a significant portion of an executive’s 20182021 equity compensation only vests if we achieve meaningful Adjusted Operating Income targets over a multi-year period. We define “Adjusted Operating Income” for these performance targets as operating income as determined under GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) but excluding the impact of (i) revenue and expensesexpense arising from any businesses acquired following the grant date but prior to the end of the applicable performance period and (ii) stock-based compensation expenses and stock-based compensation payroll taxes.

20182021 Business Performance and Compensation

Our 2018 financialThe COVID-19 pandemic and operating performances continuedthe related cost inflation primarily associated with supply chain challenges impacted profitability in 2021, but revenue growth was strong at 16.1% as demand increased, primarily due to be strong ashigher vaccination rates, patient diagnosis rates, and patient ambulation rates. At the same time, we progressedwere focused on driving commercial excellence and operational efficiencies while investing in our effortsinfrastructure and capability build, clinical evidence, innovation, and new product development to strengthen and advance our market leadership position in portable oxygen therapy. In addition, we demonstrated liquidity and strong growth in rental revenue and rental gross margin for our stockholders in 2021 compared to 2020. We continue to look for ways to enhance our business and create and sustain long-term value in several of our key business metrics.  Withmetrics, including additional technology investments, increased consumer and physician awareness, and expanded access to our leadership team, we demonstrated strong growthproducts through our rental offerings.

-31-


We faced continuing challenges in revenues, net income2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic that had an impact on our company, primarily due to supply chain constraints that limited our ability to fulfill higher demand and liquidityincreased costs, primarily related to the acquisition of semiconductor chips. However, overall recovery of patient demand for our stockholdersproducts improved faster than expected as vaccination rates improve, patients returned to travel and increased patient ambulation rates. While we continued to see fluctuations in 2018 compareddemand associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, overall demand improved from 2020, and revenue grew 16.1% in spite of the supply chain constraints. In addition, we improved Adjusted EBITDA 36.3% in 2021 versus 2020, primarily due to 2017.improved gross margin due to improved sales mix to higher margin sales channels and a double-digit price increase effective September 1, 2021, which were partially offset by higher operating expenses. This improved gross margin was in spite of the cost inflation seen for semiconductor chips. The additional investments in operating expenses were primarily for clinical research, research and development, commercial operations and building the necessary infrastructure and capabilities to support future durable revenue growth and margin expansion.

Our 2018 achievements2021 results include:

Revenue of $358.1$358.0 million, an increase of 32.3%16.1% from 2017;2020;

GAAP net incomeGross margin of $51.849.3%, an increase of 10.0% from 2020, compared to 44.8% in 2020;

Net loss of $6.3 million, or $2.30$0.28 per diluted share, compared to GAAP net incomeloss of $21.0$5.8 million or $0.96$0.27 per diluted share in 2017;2020;

Non-GAAP net income of $51.8 million, an increase of 81.4% from 2017, compared to non-GAAP net income of $28.6 million in 2017;

Non-GAAP adjusted earnings before interest expense, interest income, provision for incomes taxes, depreciation and amortization, change in fair value of earnout and stock-based compensation (non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA) of $61.3$29.5 million, an increase of 19.7%36.3% from 2017,2020, compared to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $50.8$21.6 million in 2017;

-27-


Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income of $51.2 million, an increase of 36.9% from 2017, compared to non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income of $37.4 million in 2017;2020; and

Gross margin of 49.9% compared to 48.6% in 2017; and

Cash and marketable securitiesNon-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income of $240.3$16.6 million, as of December 31, 2018, an increase of $66.4 million,245% from 2020, compared to cash and marketable securitiesnon-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income of $173.9$4.8 million as of December 31, 2017.in 2020.

Please see Appendix A attached to this proxy statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA non-GAAP net income, and non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income.

Corporate PracticesGiven our strong revenue growth and Alignmentimproved Adjusted EBITDA, we achieved above-target payout levels of performance for key metrics in our annual cash incentive plan, and maximum levels for the 2021 tranches of our performance-based equity awards.  Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, annual bonus plan payouts were made to Create Stockholder Value

Our corporate practices are designed to align with stockholder value and long-term stockholder interests, including:

Investment in Human Resources: Ourour senior executive team brings a proven track record of strategicfor 2021 at 170% payout levels, and operational leadership capabilities.  We have also recently added experienced operations talent to our team and continue to benefit from our in-house expertise.

Commitment to Employee Wellness: We are committed to creating a healthier and more satisfied workforce, which we believe contributes to our success.  We have a comprehensive approach to wellnessat 150% for the performance-based equity awards based on activities, such as annual biometric testing, flu shots, on-site gym equipment and wellness seminars, and an environment created in our workplace to support healthy living and promote the wellness of our employees.2021 performance.

Employee Development: We have invested in a Learning Management System to enhance training facilitation and tracking of training modules to support the development of employees throughout the organization.  During 2018, we deployed new courses and intend to expand our focus to include training modules that impact our entire workforce.

Overview of Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to be competitive and appropriately balance our goals of attracting, motivating, rewarding, and retaining our executive officers and driving company performance. To align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, a substantial portion of each executive officer’s target annual total direct compensation opportunity (base salary, cash incentive compensation and long-term equity awards based on grant date fair value at target levels) is “at-risk,” meaning the amounts paid to each executive officer will vary based on our company performance and their contributions to that performance.

We emphasizeHistorically, we have emphasized performance-based compensation that appropriately rewards our executive officers for delivering financial, operational, and strategic results that meet or exceed pre-established annual goals through our cash executive incentive compensation planplan.  In 2018,2021, we continued to place a strong emphasis on performance-based compensation for Mr. Shabshab and our other NEOs who were employed with us when we set annual compensation in 2021 by granting a portion of each executive officer’sof these NEO’s long-term incentive compensation, such that it vests only if we achieve certain Adjusted Operating Income goals over a multi-year period,during the three one-year performance periods, and the executive continues to provide services to us. TheFor our new hire NEOs, we placed a greater emphasis on providing compensation to recruit them to our company, including placing a greater emphasis on time-based RSUs as the long-term incentive compensation component of their 2021 total compensation.

-32-


Going forward, we expect the continued use of performance-based equity awards is intended to enhance the alignment between the interests of our executives and stockholders and provide incentives for our executives to drive long-term company growth and stockholder value.  

-28-


As illustrated by the charts below, for 2018, performance-based compensation, consisting of stock awards and annual cash incentives, made up a significant portion of the total annual direct compensation paid to our executive officers: 82% for our Chief Executive Officer and 73% for our other Named Executive Officers.

The percentages above were calculated using base salary, cash incentive compensation, and the grant date fair value of stock awards as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

20182021 Executive Compensation Highlights

Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, we took the following actions during 20182021 with respect to Named Executive OfficerNEO compensation.

Total Target Annual Compensation Mix:Competitive Cash Incentive Payments: Approximately 73% In the first quarter of our Named Executive Officers’ target2021, we established annual total direct compensation (base salary, cash incentive and long-term equity awards based on grant date fair value), in the aggregate, in the form of variable, at-risk compensation (target incentive and long-term equity awards);

Competitive Increases to Annual Base Salary: Increased annual base salaries for our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Sanford who was newly hired in 2018), generally by less than 5%opportunities to reflect competitive market conditions other than in connection with promotions. We made higher annual base salary adjustments of 20.2% for our Chief Executive Officer and 42.9% for our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, each associated with their 2017 promotions and our desire at the time of their promotions to gradually increase their base salaries to levels that are competitive with similarly situated executives at our compensation peer group for their new positions;

Competitive Annual Cash Incentive Opportunities: Established annual cash incentives to reflect competitive market conditions,overall strong performance and changes in roles and responsibilities, and designedaimed our 20182021 cash incentive compensation plan to focus 50% on Revenuerevenue and 50% on Adjusted EBITDA, two key measurements of our growth and profitability, as the criterioncriteria for payment of cash incentives to the Named Executive Officers.  NEOs.  

Based on our strong results in Revenuerevenue and Adjusted EBITDA in 2018,2021, our bonus pool funded at 128%170% of target amount;amount to our NEOs under the 2021 Incentive Plan (as defined below).

Performance-Based and Time-Based Full Value Awards:Granted long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of full value awards - RSUs. These equity awards are subject to performance- and/or time-based vesting requirements and are intended to further align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

-29-In 2021, we exceeded our threshold Adjusted Operating Income goals; as a result, the 2021 tranches of our performance-based equity awards vested at 150% of target amount for our NEOs.  


Performance-Based and Time-Based Full Value Awards:Granted long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of full value awards - restricted stock awards (RSAs).  These equity awards are subject to performance- and/or time-based vesting requirements and are intended to further align executive interests with those of our stockholders; and  

20182021 “Say-on-Pay” Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation: At last year’s annual meeting of stockholders held in May 2018,2021, approximately 97.8%99.2% of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal (excluding broker non-votes and abstentions) were cast in favor of the compensation of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs on an advisory basis. In 2018,2021, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee considered the results of the “say-on-pay” vote as one factor when making its executive compensation decisions during 2018,2021, including continuing to grant performance-based equity awards in order to remain market competitive and promote further alignment between the interests of our executives and our stockholders. Due to the continued strong support, we received from our stockholders, we retained our general approach and philosophy to executive compensation in 2018.2021.

Executive Compensation Governance Highlights

We maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices and we seek to adhere to the best practices for compensation and corporate governance purposes. The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee and in certain cases, the independent members of our Board, evaluate our executive compensation program regularly to ensure that it supports our short-term and long-term goals given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent as well as protect our stockholders’ interests. These policies and practices were in effect during 2018:2021:

Compensation Governance

 

Independent Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee and Board Approval. The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. In addition, certain executive compensation decisions at the Board level are made by independent directors;

Independent Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Advisor. The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee engaged its own independent compensation consultant to assist with its compensation review for 2018.2021. This consultant performed no other services for us;  and

Annual Executive Compensation Review. The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy.strategy; and

Equity Ownership Guidelines. The Board has adopted Equity Ownership Guidelines applicable to our directors, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Officers.

-33-


Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

Our compensation philosophy and related corporate governance policies and practices are complemented by several specific compensation practices designed to align our executive compensation with long-term stockholder interests, including:

 

Compensation At-Risk. Our executive compensation program is designed so a significant portion of compensation is “at risk” based on our performance through our short-term cash and long-term equity incentive compensation opportunities;

No Tax Reimbursements.Reimbursements on Severance or Change in Control Payments. We do not provide any tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on any severance or change-in-control payments or benefits;

No Special Retirement Plans. We do not offer, nor do we have plans to provide, pension arrangements, retirement plans or nonqualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements exclusively to our executive officers;

No Special Health or Welfare Benefits. Our executive officers participate in the same company-sponsored health and welfare benefits programs as our other full-time, salaried employees;

Hedging and Pledging Prohibited. We prohibit our employees, including our Named Executive OfficersNEOs and directors, from pledging our securities or engaging in hedging transactions; and

Multi-Year Vesting Requirements. The long-term equity awards granted to our Named Executive OfficersNEO’s generally vest over multi-yearthree one-year performance periods with respect to performance-based awards or a four-year period with respect to time-based awards, consistent with current market practice and our retention objectives.objectives, except in circumstances where necessary to retain or recruit executives; and

Compensation Recoupment Policy. We maintain a Compensation Recoupment Policy applicable to our executive officers that provides for the potential recovery of incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement under certain circumstances.

-30-


Executive Compensation PhilosophyPhilosophy and Program Design

Overview

The goals of our executive compensation program are to attract, retain, motivate and reward executive officers who contribute to our success and to incentivize these executives to achieve our short-term and long-term business objectives in order to increase long-term value and increase stockholder returns. This program combines competitive cash and equity awards in the forms and proportions that we believe will motivate our executive officers to increase stockholder value over the long term.

Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve the following specific objectives:

align the interests of our executive officers with both short-term and long-term stockholders’ interests; and

establish a direct link between our financial and operational results and strategic objectives and the compensation of our executive officers.

-31--34-

 


 

Executive Compensation Program Framework

For 2018,2021, the principal elements of our executive compensation program are summarized in the following table and described in detail in “Executive Compensation Components” below.

 

Compensation Element

Description and Purpose

Key Features

Base Salary (fixed cash)

To provide a competitive fixed level of cash compensation that reflects fulfillment of day-to-day responsibilities, skills and experience.

Annual adjustments are based on both qualitative and quantitative factors such as: job level, responsibilities and prior experience and expertise, individual performance, future potential and competitive market practice and internal equity.
   
Reviewed annually for market competitiveness.

 

Annual Cash Incentive (at-risk

(at-risk cash)

To incentivize and reward contributions of executive officers in achieving strong financial, operating and strategic objectives during the fiscal year by meeting or exceeding the established goals.
   
To ensure a strong pay-for-performance culture, as payouts are based on performance achieved relative to goals and are not guaranteed.
   

Payouts are based on a pre-determined formula that, in 2018,2021, included achievement of specified Revenuerevenue and Adjusted EBITDA targets, as determined by the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or the independent members of the Board.
   
Target incentive opportunities are typically set annually at market competitive levels.
   
Performance goals are set and approved by the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or the independent members of the Board in the first quarter of each year. Incentive payouts are capped at 200% of target.

 

 

 

 

Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation

To ensure strong performance, promote retention and align our executives’ interests with stockholders’ long-term interests through incentive compensation linked to our long-term financial and company stock price performance.
   
All equity compensation is denominated in, and valued based on the trading price of shares of Inogen stock.

Equity awards are typically granted annually using a value-based approach of granting full value awards (restricted stock awards or (restricted stock unitRSUss)) to our executive officers. These awards are subject to a mix of time- or performance-based vesting conditions over a multi-year period.

 

NEO recruitment in 2021 had a greater emphasis on time-based RSUs over performance-based RSUs.


The value of the annual equity grants to each of our NEOs is established by the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or the independent members of the Board after reviewing such factors as the competitive levels at our compensation peer companies, and to recognize our outstanding performance and our executive officers’ contributions to that performance.

-32--35-

 


 

Sign-on Bonus and Limited Perquisites

To entice key executives and other new hires to join our company.

In 2021, we provided sign-on bonuses and paid for relocation expenses for our NEOs.  

Other than the relocation payments, we offer limited perquisites to our NEOs.

 

We also offer our executive officers participationthe opportunity to participate in our 401(k) plan, health care insurance, flexible spending accounts, employee stock purchase plan and certain other benefits available generally to all of our full-time employees.

Governance of Executive Compensation Program

Role of Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee and our Board

Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee, which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, is primarily responsible for reviewing and approving or recommending to the Board the compensation arrangements for our executive officers for approval.officers. In carrying out these responsibilities, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee reviews all components of executive officer and director compensation for consistency with our compensation philosophy as in effect. The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee’s review of the base salary levels, annual cash incentive compensation opportunities, and long-term equity incentive compensation opportunities of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, generally occurs around the beginning of the year, or more frequently as warranted. To date, our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee has not established any formal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between short-term and long-term and currently paid out compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of non-cash compensation. However, as described above, our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee does aim forseeks to provide a significant portion of our executive officer compensation in the form of variable, at-risk pay.

Our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or the independent members of the Board approve executive compensation decisions after taking into account these recommendations and such other factors as they deem relevant and as further described below. Typically, executive compensation adjustments to cash compensation are effective in the first quarter of the year.

Role of Our Executive Officers

In connection with its review and approval or recommendations, our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee considers the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of our executive officers who report directly to him. These recommendations generally include annual adjustments to compensation levels and an assessment of each executive officer’s overall individual contribution, scope of responsibilities and level of experience. While our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee retains discretion to set executive officer compensation, it gives considerable weight to our Chief Executive Officer’s Officer recommendations because of his direct knowledge of each executive officer’s performance and contribution to our financial performance.business.

No other executive officer participates in the determination or recommendation of the amount or form of executive officer compensation, except thatbut our Board or our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee may discuss with our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer our financial, operating and strategic business objectives, incentive targets or performance goals. The Board or the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and determines the appropriateness of the financial measures and performance goals, as well as assesses the degree of difficulty in achieving specific incentive targets and performance goals.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to assist it by providing information, analysis, and other advice relating to our executive compensation program and the decisions resulting from its executive compensation review. TheIn 2021, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee retained Pearl Meyer to serve as its independent executive compensation consultant in 2018. In 2017, Pearl Meyer reviewedand review the competitiveness of the Company’sour compensation program for our

-36-


senior executive officers and non-employee directors. Pearl Meyer also advises the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee regarding various other executive and director compensation issues as requested.

-33-


NoneNo member of the Company’sour management team participated in the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee’s decision to retain Pearl Meyer. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee may replace Pearl Meyer or hire additional consultants at any time. Pearl Meyer attends meetings of the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee, as requested, and communicates with the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Chairperson between meetings; however, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee, or the independent members of the Board, make all decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.our executives.

Pearl Meyer provides various executive compensation consulting services to the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee with respect to the Company’s executive officersour executives and other key employees pursuant to a written consulting agreement with the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee. The services Pearl Meyer provides under the agreement include advising the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee on the principal aspects of the Company’s executive compensation program andincluding evolving best practices and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program design.

Competitive Positioning

In June 2017, our2020, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee engaged Pearl Meyer to review our executive compensation programs. Pearl Meyer’s review focused on analyzing market data drawn fromapproved a group of fifteen (15) peer group companies as described below (the “Compensation Peer Group”) and select compensation surveys.  The market data from each of these sources was blended to develop market consensus levels for each of our executive officer’s compensation by element and in total.

.  The Compensation Peer Group updated our prior peer group for merger and acquisition activity and changes in company size and included similarly-situated medical device and diagnostic companies that were identified by Pearl Meyer as companies with similar financial and growth characteristics and as competitors for executive talent based generally on the following criteria:

RevenueHad revenue for the trailing 12 months of $100$150 million to $600 million;$1 billion;

One-year revenue growth greater than or equal to 10%;

Three-year revenue growth greater than or equal to 10%;

Positive EBITDA;

MarketHad market capitalization of $500$300 million to $4 billion; and

Industry: HealthcareWas in the healthcare equipment or supplies industry, which includes medical device companies

The resultingupdated Compensation Peer Group consisted of 1517 companies that meet the industry criteria at least three of the fiveand financial criteria, and had either one or three-year revenue growth greater than 10%.criteria. The following companies comprised the Compensation Peer Group:Group plan to be used to set compensation for 2021:

 

Abaxis, Inc.AtriCure, Inc

Insulet Corporation

ABIOMED, Inc.

K2M Group Holdings,iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

AtriCure, Inc.Cantel Medical Corporation

Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Cantel Medical CorporationCardiovascular Systems Inc.

Natus Medical Inc.

Cardiovascular Systems Inc.CONMED Corporation

Nevro Corporation

CryoLife, Inc.

OraSure Technologies, Inc.

Glaukos Corporation

NxStageOrthofix Medical, Inc.

Globus Medical, Inc.

Penumbra,Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.

ICUIntersect ENT, Inc.

Wright Medical Inc.Group N.V.

Invacare Corporation

 

-34-


Certain information regarding the size and value of the Compensation Peer Group companies relative to us is set forth below (based on estimated information at the time of review in June 2017)August 2020).

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

 

(In millions except employees)

 

Inogen

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Median

 

Revenue(1)

 

$

212

 

 

$

127

 

 

$

742

 

 

$

374

 

(In millions)

 

Inogen

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Median

 

Revenue(1)

 

$

331

 

 

$

109

 

 

$

995

 

 

$

390

 

Market Capitalization

 

 

1,824

 

 

 

709

 

 

 

5,839

 

 

 

1,772

 

 

 

706

 

 

 

245

 

 

 

5,286

 

 

 

1,819

 

EBITDA(2)

 

 

34

 

 

 

(42

)

 

 

202

 

 

 

15

 

EBITDA(2)

 

 

16

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

174

 

 

 

21

 

 

(1)

Based on a twelve-month trailing at the time of the report.

(2)

Represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization based on a twelve-month trailing at the time of the report.

The compensation surveys used by Pearl Meyer in developing its market consensus were: Towers Watson – 2016 Top Management Compensation Survey (all industries), Pearl Meyer & Partners – 2016 Executive and Senior Management Survey (technology industry), and confidential surveys. For its analysis, Pearl Meyer emphasized data for companies within a revenue range comparable to our company.

In making its 2018 compensation decisions made in the first quarter of 2021, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee evaluated the target annual total direct compensation (annual base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentive) for each of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers.NEOs, who were employed with us when we set annual compensation in 2021. In

-37-


determining its recommendations for the Board on executive compensation, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed the market consensus data provided by Pearl Meyer.  The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed the market consensus data for each executive officer’s base salary and annual target cash incentive and for each executive officer’s long-term equity incentives but did not attempt to benchmark to any specific percentile. In conducting its evaluation, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee also considered, among other factors, company performance, each element of compensation, the compensation package as a whole, each executive officer’s past and expected future contribution to our business and our financial performance, and internal pay equity based on the impact on the business and performance, and retention.

We believe that this design allows us to meet the objectives of our executive compensation program, including attracting and retaining talented executives, while retaining flexibility to tailor compensation based on individual circumstances.

The Compensation Committee also reviewed market data provided by Pearl Meyer in negotiations with Messrs. Shabshab and Parr in setting their new hire compensation package in 2021.  Market data was one factor among the other factors described above that the Compensation Committee considered in designing a compensation package that was competitive and would recruit and retain these key executives to our business.

In April 2021, the Compensation Committee updated our Compensation Peer Group for merger and acquisition activity and changes in company size and included similarly-situated medical device and diagnostic companies that were identified by Pearl Meyer as companies with similar financial and growth characteristics and as competitors for executive talent based generally on the following criteria:

Had revenue for the trailing 12 months of $150 million to $1 billion (with selected exceptions);

Had market capitalization of $300 million to $4 billion (with selected exceptions); and

Was in the healthcare equipment, supplies, providers, or services industry, which includes medical device companies.

As a result of the application of these criteria, we added AngioDynamics, Inc., Avanos Medical, Inc., and Penumbra, Inc. to our Compensation Peer Group and removed Intersect ENT, Inc. (which had revenue that fell below the range described above) and Wright Medical Group N.V. (which had been acquired) from our Compensation Peer Group.  The updated Compensation Peer Group consisted of 18 companies that meet the industry criteria and financial criteria. The following companies comprised the Compensation Peer Group plan to be used for compensation decisions for the remaining part of 2021:

AtriCure, Inc

Invacare Corporation

AngioDynamics, Inc.

iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

Avanos Medical, Inc.

Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Cantel Medical Corporation

Natus Medical Inc.

Cardiovascular Systems Inc.

Nevro Corporation

CONMED Corporation

OraSure Technologies, Inc.

CryoLife, Inc.

Orthofix Medical, Inc.

Glaukos Corporation

Penumbra, Inc.

Globus Medical, Inc.

Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.

-38-


Certain information regarding the size and value of the Compensation Peer Group companies relative to us is set forth below (based on estimated information at the time of review in April 2021).

 

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

 

(In millions)

 

Inogen

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Median

 

Revenue(1)

 

$

308

 

 

$

172

 

 

$

1,016

 

 

$

384

 

Market Capitalization

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

286

 

 

 

9,998

 

 

 

2,527

 

EBITDA(2)

 

 

7

 

 

 

(69

)

 

 

203

 

 

 

12

 

(1)

Based on a twelve-month trailing at the time of the report.

(2)

Represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization based on a twelve-month trailing at the time of the report.

The Compensation Committee also reviewed market data provided by Pearl Meyer with respect to the updated Compensation Peer Group in negotiations with Dr. Glezer in its setting his new hire and promotion compensation package in 2021. Market data was one factor among the other factors described above that the Compensation Committee considered in designing a compensation package that was competitive and would recruit and retain him to our business.

Executive Compensation Elements and Corporate Performance Measure

Base Salary

We provide an annual base salary to each of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Salaries are reviewed annually by the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee or, at the request of the committee, the independent members of our Board, and adjusted for the ensuing year based on (i) both qualitative and quantitative factors such as company performance, job level, responsibilities and prior experience and expertise, individual performance, and future potential, (ii) internal review of the executive officer’s total compensation, individually and relative to our other executive officers with similar levels of responsibility within our organization and (iii) an evaluation of the compensation levels of similarly-situated executive officers in our Compensation Peer Group and in our industry generally.

For 2018Mr. Shabshab’s, Mr. Sergesketter’s, Mr. Parr’s, and Dr. Glezer’s base salaries were established through arms’ length negotiation in connection with each hire in 2021.

In setting our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee approved increases to theother NEO’s’ base salaries for 2021, we considered the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of each of our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Sanford)the NEOs who reported directly to bring levels closer tohim, the midpoint range ofNEOs role and responsibilities within the market consensus group data provided by Pearl Meyer. Mr. Sanford’s annual base salary was negotiated in connection with his hiring in 2018Company, and approved by our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee.such other factors described above.  We also considered the midpoint range as a general guideline for the appropriate level of base salaries but diddo not attempt to benchmark base salary to any specific percentile. In setting base salaries for 2018, we also considered the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of each of the Named Executive Officers who reported directly to him, the Named Executive Officer’s role and responsibilities within the Company, and such other factors described above.  We believe that this approach to setting base salary levels allows us to be competitive, while retaining flexibility to tailor compensation based on individual circumstances.  Except as otherwise indicated below, no changes were made to the base salaries of these NEOs in 2021.

-35--39-

 


 

The 20182021 base salaries for our Named Executive OfficersNEOs were as follows and were effective on February 12, 2018 except as noted below:follows:

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Base Salary(1)

 

 

Base Salary(1)

 

 

% Increase

 

Scott Wilkinson(2)

 

$

415,000

 

 

$

499,000

 

 

 

20.2

%

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

340,000

 

 

 

355,000

 

 

 

4.4

%

Brenton Taylor

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

310,000

 

 

 

3.3

%

Byron Myers(3)

 

 

245,000

 

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

42.9

%

Bart Sanford(4)

 

 

 

 

 

312,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Base Salary

 

 

Base Salary

 

 

% Increase

 

Nabil Shabshab(1)

 

$

650,000

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

Michael Sergesketter(2)

 

 

480,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr (3)

 

 

460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer (4)

 

 

460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford(5)

 

 

355,000

 

 

 

325,000

 

 

 

9.2

%

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

525,000

 

 

 

525,000

 

 

 

0.0

%

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

367,000

 

 

 

367,000

 

 

 

0.0

%

Byron Myers

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

(1)

Represents the highest annualized base salary established for the Named Executive Officer during the year indicated.

(2)

Mr. Wilkinson’s base salary was increased to $499,000 effective February 12, 2018 associated with the previous year’s promotion and our objective at the time of his promotion to gradually increase his base salary to a competitive level of with similarly situated executives at our Compensation Peer Group.

(3)

Mr. Myers was promoted to Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing effective January 1, 2017.  His 2018 base salary was increased to $300,000 effective February 12, 2018 and $350,000 effective October 1, 2018 associated with the previous year’s promotion and our objective at the time of his promotion to gradually increase his base salary to a competitive level of with similarly situated executives at our Compensation Peer Group.

(4)

Mr. Sanford’sShabshab’s base salary was effective on his date of hire on September 17, 2018.  February 8, 2021.

(2)

Mr. Sergesketter’s base compensation is $40,000 per month, which has been annualized for purposes of the table, was effective on his date of hire on December 13, 2021.

(3)

Mr. Parr’s base salary was effective on his date of hire on April 12, 2021.

(4)

The figure listed for Dr. Glezer represents the highest annualized base salary established for him during 2021.  Dr. Glezer’s base salary initially was $415,000, effective on his date of hire as Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer on June 21, 2021. In connection with his promotion to the role of Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, he entered into an amended employment agreement that increased his annualized base salary to $460,000, effective on October 11, 2021.

(5)

The figure listed for Mr. Sanford represents the highest annualized base salary established for him during 2021. The Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Sanford’s base salary from $325,000 to $355,000, effective as of November 1, 2021.

 

Cash Incentive Compensation

Overview of 20182021 Incentive Plan.  We maintained a cash executive incentive compensation plan for 20182021 (the “2018“2021 Incentive Plan”) for our eligible, non-commissioned employees, including our executive officers.officers (other than Mr. Sergesketter).  Mr. Sergesketter was not eligible to receive any bonuses during his employment, other than the completion bonus described in the “Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” section below.

The 20182021 Incentive Plan was designed to increase stockholder value and our success by motivating our employees, including our participating Named Executive Officers,NEOs, to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve our objectives.  The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee determined the performance goals applicable to target awards under the 20182021 Incentive Plan.  

Target Cash Incentive Opportunities.  EachExcept for Mr. Sergesketter, each of our executive officers, including each of our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, was assigned a target annual incentive compensation opportunity under the 20182021 Incentive Plan, which was calculated as a percentage of his or her annual base salary for 2018. No changes were made toas of the target bonus percentageend of any of our Named Executive Officers in 2018.  Mr. Sanford’s target bonus percentage was established in connection with his hiring, and approved by our Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee.2021.

-36--40-

 


 

The annual cash incentive compensation opportunities of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs for fiscal 20182021 were:

 

 

2018 Target Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity (as a

percentage of base salary)

 

 

2018 Target

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity

 

 

2018 Maximum

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity

 

 

2018 Actual

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

 

 

2021 Target Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity (as a

percentage of base salary)

 

 

2021 Target

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity

 

 

2021 Maximum

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

Opportunity

 

 

2021 Actual

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

 

Name

 

(%)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

($)(3)

 

 

(%)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

($)(3)

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

 

85.0

%

 

$

493,466

 

 

$

986,932

 

 

$

848,938

 

Michael Sergesketter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr

 

 

60.0

%

 

 

198,871

 

 

 

397,742

 

 

 

342,877

 

Stanislav Glezer(4)

 

40.0% - 60.0%

 

 

 

111,027

 

 

 

222,055

 

 

 

194,454

 

Bart Sanford(4)

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

130,000

 

 

 

260,000

 

 

 

225,381

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

70.0

%

 

$

349,300

 

 

$

698,600

 

 

$

443,034

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

142,000

 

 

 

284,000

 

 

 

181,868

 

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

146,800

 

 

 

293,600

 

 

 

250,520

 

Brenton Taylor

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

126,000

 

 

 

252,000

 

 

 

158,937

 

Byron Myers

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

124,000

 

 

 

248,000

 

 

 

158,523

 

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

140,000

 

 

 

280,000

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford(4)

 

 

40.0

%

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

(1)

Based on 100% of target.

(2)

Based on 200% of target.

(3)

The amounts in this column represent the amounts actually earned bypaid to each of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs under the 20182021 Incentive Plan, as discussed below.

(4)

Mr. Sanford’s 2018 Annual CashDr. Glezer’s target annual incentive compensation opportunity under the 2021 Incentive CompensationPlan initially was pro-rated based on40% of his annual base salary. In connection with his promotion to the numberrole of calendar days during 2018Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, he entered into an amended employment agreement that increased his target annual incentive compensation opportunity to the sum of (i) 40% of the salary he received under his original employment agreement and (ii) 60% of the salary he received in which he was employed with the Company; provided, however, that the 2018 Annual Cash Incentive would not be less than $100,000 on a pre-tax basis.2021 under his amended employment agreement.

20182021 Incentive Plan Performance Goals.  For fiscal 2018,2021, we shifted from exclusively measuringcontinued to measure the incentive compensation plan on the corporate performance objective of Adjusted EBITDA to measuring the 20182021 Incentive Plan on the corporate performance objectives of Revenuerevenue (weighted 50%) and Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%). We use Revenuerevenue and Adjusted EBITDA to provide incentives for our employees to drive both revenue and earnings growth and make adjustments to exclude certain non-cash and other expenses that are not indicative of our core operating results. For purposes of the 2021 Incentive Plan, Adjusted EBITDA excluded the cash sign-on bonus (and the employer portion of employment taxes on the bonus) and relocation and temporary living expense reimbursements provided to Mr. Shabshab under his employment agreement and the salary paid to Mr. Wilkinson during the period he provided transition services to us as a non-executive employee under his transition agreement. The 20182021 Incentive Plan funded based on our actual achievement against this metric according to the formula set forth below:

 

Payout Percentage (1)

 

 

Revenue

Achievement Level (2)

(50% weighting)

 

Adjusted EBITDA

Achievement Level (3)

(50% weighting)

0%

 

 

$249.4308.5 Million

 

$50.88.2 Million

25%

 

 

$262.8Million313.3 Million

 

$53.610.3 Million

50%

 

 

$276.2318.2 Million

 

$56.412.5 Million

75%

 

 

$289.6323.0 Million

 

$59.214.7 Million

100%

 

 

$303.0327.8 Million

 

$62.016.9 Million

125%

 

 

$325.3346.8 Million

 

$63.918.2 Million

150%

 

 

$347.6365.8 Million

 

$65.819.5 Million

175%

 

 

$369.9384.8 Million

 

$67.720.8 Million

200%

 

 

$392.2403.8 Million

 

$69.622.1 Million

 

(1)

“Payout Percentage” refers to the percentage of target incentive payout earned at each revenue or Adjusted EBITDA achievement level indicated.

(2)

“Level” refers to the level of achievement of the target performance goal necessary to earn any incentive payout under the plan.  The revenue payout percentage (as a percent of target incentive) was determined using linear interpolation if actual results were greater than $249.4$308.5 million but less than $303.0$327.8 million for payouts up to 100% and using linear interpolation if actual results

-41-


were greater than $303.0$327.8 million but less than $392.2$403.8 million for payouts up to 200%., in each case rounded to the nearest whole percentage. If revenue exceeded $392.2$403.8 million, the payout percentage would have been 200%.

(3)

“Level” refers to the level of achievement of the target performance goal necessary to earn any incentive payout under the plan.  The Adjusted EBITDA payout percentage (as a percent of target incentive) was determined using linear interpolation if actual results were greater than $50.8$8.2 million but less than $62.0$16.9 million for payouts up to 100% and using linear interpolation if actual results were greater than $62.0$16.9 million but less than $69.6$22.1 million for payouts up to 200%., in each case rounded to the nearest whole percentage. If Adjusted EBITDA exceeded $69.6$22.1 million, the payout percentage would have been 200%.

-37-


The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee reserved the right to increase, decrease, or eliminate any incentive payment that may be payable under the 20182021 Incentive Plan, based on the factors it deemed relevant.

20182021 Incentive Plan Achievement

Following the endOur 2021 results were revenue of 2018, our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee determined our Revenue was $358.1$358.0 million (resulting in a payout percentage achievement of 161.8%140%) and Adjusted EBITDA was $61.3$29.5 million (resulting in a payout percentage achievement of 93.6%200%).  Accordingly, the 20182021 Incentive Plan funded at an aggregate weighted payout percentage of 128%170% of target and our eligible executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers,eligible NEOs, received payment under the 20182021 Incentive Plan at 128%170% of target levels.  The actual amount of each Named Executive Officer’seligible NEO’s payment under the 20182021 Incentive Plan is also set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan” compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table below.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

We believe long-term incentive compensation is an effective means for focusing our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, on driving improved financial performance and increased stockholder value over a multi-year period, provides a meaningful reward for long-term value creation, and motivates them to remain employed with us.

This approach aligns the contributions of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders and allows them to participate in any future appreciation in our common stock.

We determineIn 2021, we determined long-term incentive compensation for our executive officersMs. Bauerlein and Messrs. Sanford and Myers as part of our annual compensation review and after considering a competitive market analysis, the recommendations of our the Chief Executive Officer (except regarding his own long-term incentive compensation), the outstanding equity holdings of each executive officer, the projected impact of the proposed awards on our earnings, our outstanding company performance in 2017 and their contributions towards achieving performance, and the other factors described above. We did not benchmark long-term incentive compensation to any specific percentile.

The Compensation, NominatingIn 2021, we determined the long-term incentive compensation opportunities for Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr, and Governance Committee recommended,Dr. Glezer through arms-length negotiations in connection with their hiring after considering a competitive market analysis and the independent members ofamounts and terms that they believed were necessary to recruit these executives to our company.

-42-


In February 2021, the BoardCompensation Committee approved in February 2018, equity awards to our Named Executive OfficersNEOs in the form of RSAsRSUs in the following amounts and on the following terms excepteffective as noted below:of March 1, 2021 (or for the grants to Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer shortly following their hiring dates):

 

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSUs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Time-based

 

 

Performance and

time-based(1)

 

 

Total Equity

Awards of

Restricted Stock

 

 

Equity Awards

(Aggregate Grant

Date Fair Value)

 

 

Time-based

 

 

Performance-based(1)

 

 

Total Target Number of Shares subject to RSUs

 

 

Equity Awards

(Aggregate Grant

Date Fair Value)

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

 

52,690

 

(2)

 

18,818

 

 

 

71,508

 

 

$

3,799,935

 

Michael Sergesketter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

George Parr

 

 

18,015

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,015

 

 

$

1,199,979

 

Stanislav Glezer

 

 

12,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,298

 

 

$

799,985

 

Bart Sanford(2)

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

7,526

 

 

$

399,932

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

8,196

 

 

 

12,294

 

 

 

20,490

 

 

$

1,749,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

3,278

 

 

 

4,917

 

 

 

8,195

 

 

$

699,853

 

 

 

12,231

 

 

 

12,231

 

 

 

24,462

 

 

$

1,299,911

 

Brenton Taylor

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

3,196

 

 

 

5,327

 

 

$

454,969

 

Byron Myers

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

3,196

 

 

 

5,327

 

 

$

454,969

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

7,526

 

 

$

399,932

 

Bart Sanford(2)

 

 

1,423

 

 

 

2,134

 

 

 

3,557

 

 

$

718,428

 

 

(1)

This column represents the restricted stock awardsperformance-based RSUs granted at maximumtarget levels of performance.

(2)

The Compensation, NominatingRepresents an award of 33,872 RSUs (the “Shabshab New Hire Award”) and Governance Committee approved Mr. Sanford’s equity awards in August 2018, effective asan award of his first day of employment.  Mr. Sanford’s time-based awards vest 25% on the first anniversary of December 1, 2018 and 1/16th vest quarterly thereafter subject to his continued service with us. The performance-based awards follow the terms set forth below.18,818 RSUs.

ExceptEach time-based award (other than the Shabshab New Hire Award) vests as noted above for Mr. Sanford,to 25% of the time-based awards vest 25%total number of RSUs on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/16th of the total number of RSUs quarterly thereafter, subject to the NEO’s continued service with us.  The Shabshab New Hire Award vests as to 50% of the total number of RSUs on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/16th vest of the total number of RSUs quarterly thereafter subject to the Named Executive Officer’sMr. Shabshab’s continued service with us.The size and terms of the Shabshab New Hire Award were established by the Compensation Committee and Board at levels that they believed are necessary to recruit Mr. Shabshab to our company after factoring in his potential compensation from his prior employer, his past experience, and expected future contributions to our company.

-38-


The performance-based awards are separated into three substantially equal tranches and are earned based on our achievements against Adjusted Operating Income targets for 2018, 2019,2021, 2022, and 2020,2023, respectively, and each tranche vests following the end of each performance period on March 1, subject to the Named Executive Officer’sNEO’s continued service with us on the applicable vesting date. If, prior to the end of any performance period, there is a “change in control” (as defined in the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan), then shares corresponding to that performance period are achieved at target and will vest as of immediately prior to such change in control.

The performance-based awards are earned based on our achievement of Adjusted Operating Income for the performance period that applies to each tranche. The Adjusted Operating Income performance measure has a sliding scale so each Named Executive OfficerNEO may achieve from 0% to 150% of the target award amount. The achievement percentage for the performance-based awards is determined using a linear interpolation if actual results are greater than the minimum amount but less than 150% target.

We previously granted performance-based equity awards to certain of our NEOs in March 2019 and March 2020.  Each of these equity awards is separated into three substantially equal tranches that vest based on our achievement against performance goals related to Adjusted Operating Income for the year the award was granted and each of the following two

-43-


years.For the tranche based on achievement of Adjusted Operating Income in 2021, the number of shares covered by the tranche is discussed below.

The following table shows the 20182021 actual payout level for the first, second and secondthird tranches of the performance-based awards granted in August 2017March 2019, February 2020, and March 2018,2021, which were based on achievement of 20182021 Adjusted Operating Income. Adjusted Operating Income was greater than the maximum threshold level of achievement for each of these tranches of these equity awards and the maximum number of shares covered by these tranches were earned or vested.

 

Grant Date

 

Adjusted Operating Income Threshold

 

 

Adjusted Operating Income Target

��

 

Adjusted Operating Income Maximum

 

 

Adjusted Operating Income Actual

 

8/8/2017

(Second Tranche)

 

$37.4 million

 

 

$45.6 million

 

 

$45.6 million

 

 

$51.2 million

 

Payout %

(Second Tranche)

 

0.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

3/2/2018

(First Tranche)

 

$37.4 million

 

 

$47.1 million

 

 

$54.0 million

 

 

$51.2 million

 

Payout %

(First Tranche)

 

0.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

 

129.0%

 

Grant Date

 

Adjusted Operating Income Threshold

 

 

Adjusted Operating Income Target

 

 

Adjusted Operating Income Maximum

 

 

Adjusted Operating Income Actual

 

3/1/2019

(Third Tranche)

 

$5.4 million

 

 

$6.3 million

 

 

$6.7 million

 

 

$17.0 million(1)

 

Vesting Percentage

(Third Tranche)

 

0.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

2/28/2020

(Second Tranche)

 

$4.8 million

 

 

$5.3 million

 

 

$5.5 million

 

 

$16.6 million

 

Vesting Percentage

(Second Tranche)

 

0.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

3/1/2021

(First Tranche)

 

$4.8 million

 

 

$5.0 million

 

 

$8.0 million

 

 

$16.6 million

 

Vesting Percentage

(First Tranche)

 

0.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

 

150.0%

 

(1)

The Adjusted Operating Income definition for the 3/1/2019 grant includes an additional adjustment for revenue and expenses arising from any businesses acquired following the grant date but prior to the end of the applicable performance period that totaled $0.4 million in fiscal year 2021.

 

The Adjusted Operating Income targets for the second and third performance periods of the 2018 Restricted Stock Awards,2021 RSUs, or 20192022 and 2020,2023, respectively, are based on Adjusted Operating Income growth percentagespercentage of 20% and 18%, respectively.8%. Adjusted Operating Income growth for the second performance period is based on the Company’s growth in Adjusted Operating Income from 20182021 to 20192022 and the third performance period is based on the Company’s growth in Adjusted Operating Income from 20192022 to 2020.2023.

Retirement, Welfare and Health Benefits

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit programs on the same basis as our other full-time, salaried employees. We sponsor a Section 401(k) profit-sharing plan, which is intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 401(a) of the Code. All of our employees, including the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, are eligible to participate on the first day of the month following the date of hire. The Section 401(k) plan includes a salary deferral arrangement under which participants may elect to defer up to 80% of their current eligible compensation not over the statutorily prescribed limit and have their compensation deferral contributed to the Section 401(k) plan. The Company began matching contributions to this plan for all eligible employees in 2017.2017 but suspended matching contributions effective July 1, 2020 due to the financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, matching contributions were reinstated on June 21, 2021.

Our health and welfare benefits include medical, dental and vision benefits, long-term disability insurance, basic life insurance coverage, health savings accounts, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance. We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market, and compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon changes in applicable laws and market practices.

-39--44-

 


 

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We do not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, except in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive officers more efficient and effective, and for recruitment and retention purposes. During 2018,2021, none of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs received perquisites or other personal benefits that were, in the aggregate, $10,000 or more for such individual except forwith the exception of Mr. SanfordShabshab, Mr. Parr, and Dr. Glezer, who received reimbursement of relocation and/or temporary housing expenses (with all such expenses grossed up for applicable taxes), in accordance with their employment agreements (including repayment provisions if their employment with us terminates sooner under certain circumstances), all as described in further detail in the “Employment Agreements and temporary livingPost-Employment Compensation” section below. In addition, pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, we agreed to pay a $5,000 bonus to each of Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer for miscellaneous moving expenses (and in connectionMr. Parr’s case, a gross up for applicable taxes).  The Compensation Committee believed that providing Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr, and Dr. Glezer with his hiring with us.these benefits was important in order to recruit them to join our company.  The actual amounts paid to Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr, and Dr. Glezer in 2021 are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table below.  We believed that providing these amounts was necessary in order to recruit these executives and assist with their transition to work from our home offices in Goleta, CA.

In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as those offered to Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer in accordance with their employment agreements, as described in the preceding paragraph. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits for executive officers will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee.

Employment and Transition Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation

We have entered into written employment offer lettersagreements with each of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers.NEOs. Each of these agreements was approved by our Board or the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee.Committee at the time of approval.

In filling each of our executive officer positions, our Board and the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee at the time of the executive officer’s appointment recognized the need to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates in a dynamic labor market. Our Board and the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee at the time of appointment were sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officers into the executive compensation structure that we were seeking to develop, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations.

For informationIn connection with their joining the Company, we entered into employment agreements with Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer in 2021 and an employment agreement with Ms. Caltrider in 2022.  Each employment agreement provides an initial base salary, annual cash incentive opportunity, and initial equity awards, which are described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer.  Ms. Caltrider’s employment agreement provides for a base salary of $440,000, a target annual cash incentive opportunity of 60% of her base salary, and an equity award of 34,081 RSUs (which had an approximate grant value of $1,200,000 based on the specifictime of determination of the award) that vests as to one-third of the total number of RSUs on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/12th of the total number of RSUs quarterly thereafter subject to Ms. Caltrider’s continued service with us.  In addition, each employment agreement provides that the applicable NEO will be eligible for annual equity awards beginning in 2022 (or in Ms. Caltrider’s case, 2023) having an expected grant date value of (i) for Mr. Shabshab, at least $2 million, (ii) for Ms. Caltrider, $800,000, (iii) for Mr. Parr, between $700,000 and $800,000, and (iv) for Dr. Glezer, $400,000, with these equity awards vesting based on the same terms and conditions ofas the employment offer letters ofannual equity awards made to the Named Executive Officer, see the discussion of “Employment Agreements for Executive Officers” below.Company’s similarly situated executives.  We believed that providing these NEOs with equity award commitments was important in order to recruit them to our business.  

Post-Employment Compensation

The employment agreements with Mr. Shabshab, Mr. Parr and Dr. Glezer also provide that we havewill cover the costs of certain relocation and moving expenses, including the following:

Mr. Shabshab’s employment agreement provides that we will cover up to $100,000 in reasonable moving expenses related to moving his primary residence to the Goleta, California area, reasonable costs for him to

-45-


move himself and his spouse to the Goleta, California area, including up to two house-hunting trips to the Goleta, California that are incurred before the second anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement, the closing costs on the purchase of a new personal home in the Goleta, California area, and reasonable temporary housing expenses for a furnished one-bedroom apartment in the Goleta, California area, all as described in his employment agreement (including a gross up for applicable taxes).  If, prior to the second anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement, his employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by him voluntarily without “good reason”, he has agreed to refund us a pro rata portion (based on the number of full months he is employed with us during the 24-month period commencing on the effective date of the employment agreement) of the net after tax amount of all payments or reimbursements described in this paragraph within 60 days of the termination date.  

Mr. Parr’s employment agreement provides that we will cover up to $100,000 in reasonable moving expenses related to moving his primary residence to the Goleta, California area plus storage, reasonable costs for him to move himself and his spouse to the Goleta, California area, including up to two house-hunting trips to the Goleta, California that are incurred before the first anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement, the closing costs on the purchase of a new personal home in the Goleta, California area, and reasonable temporary housing expenses for a furnished one-bedroom apartment (or hotel accommodations if a one-bedroom apartment is not available) in the Goleta, California area, all as described in his employment agreement (including a gross up for applicable taxes).  In addition, he also received a moving expense bonus (including a gross up for applicable taxes) as described in the “Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits” section above.  If, prior to the second anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement, his employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by him voluntarily without “good reason”, he has agreed to refund us the net after tax amount of all payments or reimbursements described in this paragraph within 60 days of the termination date.  

Dr. Glezer’s employment agreement provides that, if he relocates to the Goleta, California area before the second anniversary of the effective day of the effective date of the employment agreement, we will cover up to $100,000 in reasonable moving expenses related to moving his primary residence to Goleta, California plus storage, reasonable costs for him to move himself and his spouse to the Goleta, California area, including up to two house-hunting trips to the Goleta, California, and the closing costs on the purchase of a new personal home in the Goleta, California area, all as described in his employment agreement (including a gross up for applicable taxes).  In addition, he also received a moving expense bonus as described in the “Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits” section above.  If, prior to the second anniversary of the date he first incurred any of the expenses described in this paragraph, his employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by him voluntarily without “good reason”, he has agreed to refund us a pro rata portion (based on the number of full months he is employed with us during the 24-month period commencing on the date of his relocation to the Goleta, California area) of the net after tax amount of all payments or reimbursements described in this paragraph within 30 days of the termination date.  

In addition, under their employment agreements, Mr. Shabshab, Ms. Caltrider, Mr. Parr, and Dr. Glezer are eligible for severance and change of control benefits upon certain qualifying terminations of their employment.

In connection with his joining the Company, we entered into an offer letter with our executive officers, includingMichael Sergesketter, which provides for a bonus of $10,000 upon the Named completion of the term of the offer letter.

In connection with Ms. Bauerlein’s resignation as Executive Officers, includeVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer and Mr. Myers’ resignation as Executive Vice President, Marketing, we entered into transition agreements with them, whereby they agreed to provide transition services to us as non-executive employees and were eligible to receive certain change in control severance arrangements.payments and benefits upon the termination of their employment with the Company.  

-46-


In addition, the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan’) provides all employees, including our Named Executive OfficersNEOs with the followingcertain vesting acceleration benefits:  in the event of an “involuntary termination” (as defined in the Plan) on or within twelve (12) months following a “change in control” (as defined in the Plan), as discussed below in the participant will fully vestPotential Payments Upon Termination or Upon Change in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, including shares as to which such awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse, and, with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels and all other terms and conditions met.Control” section.

For the performance-based awards, if, prior to the end of any performance period, there is a “change in control” (as defined in the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan), then shares corresponding to that performance period are achieved at target and will vest as of immediately prior to such change in control.

Having reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements in place is essential to attracting and retaining highly-qualifiedhighly qualified executive officers. Our post-employment compensation arrangements are designed to provide reasonable compensation to executive officers who leave us under certain circumstances to facilitate their transition to new employment as well as to encourage such employees to ease any transition that may be required in the context of a change in control. Further, we seek to mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation by requiring a departing executive officer to sign a separation and release agreement acceptable to us as a condition to receiving post-employment compensation payments or benefits.

-40-


We do not consider specific amounts payable under these post-employment compensation arrangements when establishing annual compensation. However, we believe these arrangements are necessary to offer compensation packages that are competitive.

These arrangements align the interests of management and stockholders when considering the long-term future for the Company. The primary purpose of these arrangements is to keep our most senior executive officers focused on pursuing corporate transaction activity in the best interests of stockholders regardless of whether those transactions may cause their own job loss.

Except for the performance-based awards, all payments and benefits if a change-in-control of ours occurs are payable only if there is a subsequent qualifying loss of employment by an executive officer (a so-called “double-trigger” arrangement). We use this double-trigger arrangement to protect against losing retention power following a change in control of the Company and to avoid windfalls to the executives, both of which could occur if vesting accelerated automatically because of the transaction.

For information on the change in control severance agreements for the Named Executive Officers, and an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these agreements and the 2014 Plan and an estimate of these potential payments and benefits as of the end of fiscal 2018,2021, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination and Upon Termination Following a Change in Controlsection below.

Sign-on Bonuses

Under their employment agreements, Mr. Shabshab, Ms. Caltrider, Mr. Parr, and Dr. Glezer each received a cash sign-on bonus in the amount of (i) $1,700,000 for Mr. Shabshab, (ii) $300,000 for Ms. Caltrider, (iii) $110,000 for Mr. Parr, and (iv) $200,000 for Dr. Glezer.  If, prior to the 2-year anniversary of the effective date of his or her employment agreement, the NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company for “cause” or the NEO resigns without “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the NEO’s employment agreement), he or she must repay to the Company (within 30 days of the termination date) the following amount: (i) in Mr. Shabshab’s case, a pro rata portion (based on the number of full months he is employed with us during the 24-month period commencing on the effective date of the employment agreement) of the gross amount of his sign-on bonus, (ii) the cases of Ms. Caltrider and Dr. Glezer, a pro rata portion (based on the number of full months the NEO is employed with us during the 24-month period commencing on the effective date of his or her employment agreement) of the net after tax amount of his or her sign-on bonus, or (iii) in Mr. Parr’s case, the entire net after tax amount of his sign-on bonus.

-47-


The Compensation Committee and Board approved these sign-on bonuses after considering the amounts that would be necessary to recruit them join our company, including the compensation opportunities that they would be forfeiting from their prior employers.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Compensation Recoupment Policy

We maintain a policy to recover annual or long-term incentive compensation provided to current and former executive officers in the event that we are required to file a restatement of our audited financial statements with the SEC and the executive officer receives incentive compensation (within 3 years before the date we announce the restatement) based on materially inaccurate financial and operating measure. The policy applies to any current and former executive officer who receives a cash or equity incentive award on or after the effective date of the policy.  The Compensation Committee administers the policy.

Equity Ownership Guidelines

We maintain equity ownership guidelines to further align interests of directors and executives with those of our stockholders.  Each of our directors who receive compensation from us and each of our NEOs shall comply with the minimum ownership levels and timing of compliance outlined in the equity ownership guidelines. In October 2021, our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved an amendment to the equity ownership guidelines to increase the minimum ownership levels for our CEO and other executives.  The following are the current guideline levels:

Non-employee director: 3x the annual cash retainer for Board service

CEO: 5x his/her annual base salary (which was increased from 4x his annual base salary)

Executive Vice Presidents: 3x his/her annual base salary (which was increased from 2x his/her annual base salary)

If a director who receives compensation from us or NEO fails to reach, or falls below, the minimum ownership level set forth in the equity ownership guidelines, he or she may be required to retain 100% of any net shares derived from vested awards under our equity incentive plans until his or her minimum ownership level is met or, if necessary, to retain the minimum ownership level.

The individuals subject to these guidelines will have until the later of the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the guidelines or, if applicable, five years after the date the covered individual is appointed or elected, as applicable, to his or her position to comply with the minimum stock ownership requirement.

Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading, Hedging, Short Sales or Pledging of Our Equity Securities

OurSubject to certain limited exceptions contained in our insider trading compliance policy, our insider trading compliance policy prohibits all our employees, including our executive officers, and the members of our Board from (i) directly or indirectly engaging in any transaction involving our securities while aware of material nonpublic information relating to us, (ii) engaging in transactions involving the securities of any other company while aware of material nonpublic information about that company, (iii) disclosing material nonpublic information concerning us or any other company to friends, family members or any other person or entity not authorized to receive such information where such person or entity may benefit by trading on the basis of such information, (iv) engaging in derivative securities transactions, including hedging, regarding our common stock, (v) engaging in short sales of our securities, and from(vi) pledging companyour securities as collateral or holding companyour securities in a margin account.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Generally, Code Section 162(m) disallows public companies a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes of remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to their chief executive officer and certain other current and former officers who qualify as “covered employees” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m). Under a transition rule in the regulations promulgated under Code Section 162(m) that applies to companies, such as ours, that become subject to Code Section 162(m) by reason of becoming publicly held, the deductibility of our compensation payments currently is not subject to the limitations of Code Section 162(m) if the compensation is paid under a compensation arrangement that was in existence before the effective date of the initial public offering and certain other requirements are met.  This transition period for us expired at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2018.  

Prior to 2018, Code Section 162(m) provided an additional exception that stated that remuneration in excess of $1 million to employees that are subject to the Code Section 162(m) deduction limits may only be deducted if it is “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) or qualifies for one of the other exemptions from the deductibility limit.

Recent tax reform legislation eliminated the exception for “performance-based” compensation beginning in 2018 and expanded the number of individuals covered by Section 162(m) of the Code and, subject to certain exceptions for compensation payable pursuant to a “written binding contract” in effect on November 2, 2017 that has not been subsequently materially modified.  As a result, we will not have the ability to make use of the “performance-based compensation” exception to exempt remuneration payable to employees that are subject to the Code Section 162(m) deduction limits.

-41-


While the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as a factor in making compensation decisions, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee retains the flexibility to provide compensation that is consistent with our goals for our executive compensation program even if such compensation is not fully tax deductible.  The Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee may make decisions that result in compensation that is not fully deductible under Code Section 162(m).

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We follow the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) for our stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and members of our Board, including options to purchase shares of our common stock and other stock awards, based on the grant date “fair

-48-


“fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the executive compensation tables required by the federal securities laws, even though the recipient of the awards may realize no value from their awards.

Executive Employment Arrangements

Scott Wilkinson

We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Scott Wilkinson, our Chief Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2017. For 2018, Mr. Wilkinson’s base salary was $499,000. On February 22, 2019, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee approved an increase of Mr. Wilkinson’s base salary to $525,000, effective April 1, 2019, and an additional sequential increase to a new base salary of $551,000, effective September 30, 2019. Mr. Wilkinson’s annual performance incentive target is 70% of his base salary.

Mr. Wilkinson is entitled under his employment agreement to the following severance and change of control benefits upon certain qualifying terminations.

If Mr. Wilkinson’s employment is terminated without “cause” (excluding by reason of death or disability) or he resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement), he will be eligible to receive the following benefits if he timely signs and does not revoke a release of claims:

if outside the Change in Control Period, continued payment of his base salary for a period of 24 months (collectively, the “CEO Severance Payments”); and

throughout the period during which he would be able to obtain COBRA coverage, Mr. Wilkinson and his dependents will only be required to pay the portion of the costs of medical benefits as Mr. Wilkinson was required to pay as of the date of his termination, or Mr. Wilkinson will receive taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event the Company determines that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law (the “CEO COBRA Benefits”).

In the event any of the amounts provided for under this employment agreement or otherwise payable to Mr. Wilkinson would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and could be subject to the related excise tax, Mr. Wilkinson would be entitled to receive either full payment of benefits under this employment agreement or such lesser amount which would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the greater amount of after-tax benefits to Mr. Wilkinson.  The employment agreement does not require us to provide any tax gross-up payments.

Alison Bauerlein, Brenton Taylor, Byron Myers and Bart Sanford

We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Alison Bauerlein, our Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, Brenton Taylor, our Executive Vice President, Engineering, and Byron Myers, our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, effective January 1, 2017, with respect to Mr. Myers and October 1, 2013, with respect to Ms. Bauerlein and Mr. Taylor. We entered into an employment and severance agreement with Bart Sanford, our Executive Vice president, Operations, effective August 17, 2018.  Ms. Bauerlein’s 2018 base salary was $355,000 and she is eligible to receive an annual

-42-


performance incentive target of 40% of her base salary. Mr. Taylor’s 2018 base salary was $310,000 and he is eligible to receive an annual performance incentive target of 40% of his base salary. Mr. Myer’s 2018 base salary was $350,000 (effective October 1, 2018) and he is eligible to receive an annual performance incentive target of 40% of his base salary. Mr. Sanford’s 2018 base salary was $312,000, and he is eligible to receive an annual performance incentive target of 40% of his base salary. On February 22, 2019, our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee approved base salary increases for our Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Myers, whose salary was increased in October 2018. Ms. Bauerlein’s base salary was increased to $367,000, effective April 1, 2019. Mr. Taylor’s base salary was increased to $322,000, effective April 1, 2019. Mr. Sanford’s salary was increased to $325,000, effective June 1, 2019.

Each of Ms. Bauerlein, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Myers and Mr. Sanford is entitled under his or her respective employment agreement to the following severance and change of control benefits upon certain qualifying terminations.

If the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated without “cause” (excluding by reason of death or disability) or the Named Executive Officer resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement) outside of the  period beginning three (3) months before a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement) and ending twelve (12) months after a change in control (the “Change in Control Period”), such Named Executive Officer will be eligible to receive the following benefits if he or she timely signs and does not revoke a release of claims:

Continued payment of his or her base salary for a period of 12 months (the “NEO Severance Payments”); and

Throughout the period during which he or she would be able to obtain COBRA coverage, the named executive and his or her eligible dependents will only be required to pay the portion of the costs of medical benefits as he or she was required to pay as of the date of his termination, or he or she will receive taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event the Company determines that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law (the “NEO COBRA Benefits”).

If, during the Change of Control Period, the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated without cause (excluding by reason of death or disability) or he or she resigns for good reason, he or she will be eligible to receive the NEO Severance Payments and NEO COBRA Benefits, however, with respect to Ms. Bauerlein, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Myers, the NEO Severance Payments will continue for a period of 24 months.

In the event any of the amounts provided for under an employment agreement or otherwise payable to the Named Executive Officer would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and could be subject to the related excise tax, the Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive either full payment of benefits under the employment agreement or such lesser amount which would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the greater amount of after-tax benefits to the Named Executive Officer. None of the aforementioned employment agreements require us to provide any tax gross-up payments.

Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee Report

The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and Inogen’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board:

Kevin King (Chairperson)

Heather Rider (Chairperson)

Heath Lukatch

Scott BeardsleyMary Kay Ladone

The Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Inogen under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent Inogen specifically incorporates the Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee Report by reference therein.

-43-


Compensation Risk Assessment

Our management team and our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee each play a role in evaluating and mitigating any risk that may exist relating to our compensation programs, policies and practices for all employees, including our Named Executive Officers.NEOs. Our management team and our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee review our employee compensation plans and arrangements in which our employees (including our Named Executive Officers)NEOs) participate to determine whether these plans and arrangements have any features that might create undue risks or encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking that could threaten our value. Based on our review, we have concluded that any potential risks arising from our employee compensation programs, policies and practices, including our executive compensation program, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

-49-


20212018 Summary Compensation Table

The following table, footnotes, and narrative provide information regarding the compensation awarded to, or earned by, our executive officers, including each of our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, during 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016.2019.  

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Option

Awards

($)(2)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(3)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total

Compensation

 

 

Year

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(2)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total

Compensation

 

Nabil Shabshab,

 

2021

 

$

587,500

 

(3)

$

1,700,000

 

(4)

$

3,799,935

 

(5)

$

848,938

 

 

$

100,000

 

(6)

$

7,036,373

 

Chief Executive Officer and President, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Sergesketter,

 

2021

 

$

27,692

 

(7)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

27,692

 

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr,

 

2021

 

$

336,154

 

(8)

$

110,000

 

(4)

$

1,199,979

 

(9)

$

342,877

 

 

$

10,914

 

(10)

$

1,999,924

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer,

 

2021

 

$

233,846

 

(11)

$

200,000

 

(4)

$

799,985

 

(12)

$

194,454

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,428,285

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford,

 

2021

 

$

330,288

 

 

$

 

 

$

399,932

 

(13)

$

225,381

 

 

$

2,550

 

(14)

$

958,151

 

Executive Vice President, Operations

 

2020

 

$

327,500

 

 

$

 

 

$

399,934

 

(15)

$

 

 

$

3,250

 

(14)

$

730,684

 

 

2019

 

$

327,500

 

 

$

 

 

$

699,798

 

(16)

$

 

 

$

45,115

 

(17)

$

1,072,413

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Wilkinson,

 

2018

 

$

494,458

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,749,846

 

(4)

$

 

 

$

443,034

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,687,338

 

 

2021

 

$

224,134

 

(18)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

224,134

 

Chief Executive Officer and President, Director

 

2017

 

 

402,177

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,099,949

 

(5)

 

 

 

 

346,240

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,848,366

 

Former Chief Executive Officer and President, Director

 

2020

 

$

529,039

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,999,945

 

(19)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,528,984

 

 

2016

 

 

336,289

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,441,615

 

 

 

301,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,079,404

 

 

2019

 

$

520,619

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,999,911

 

(20)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,520,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein,

 

2018

 

$

355,212

 

 

$

 

 

$

699,853

 

(6)

$

 

 

$

181,868

 

 

$

5,500

 

(7)

$

1,242,433

 

 

2021

 

$

368,412

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,299,911

 

(21)

$

250,520

 

 

$

2,130

 

(14)

$

1,920,973

 

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

 

2017

 

 

336,251

 

 

$

 

 

 

647,458

 

(8)

$

 

 

 

168,126

 

 

 

5,400

 

(7)

$

1,157,236

 

 

2016

 

 

326,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,272,013

 

 

 

195,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,793,263

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brenton Taylor,

 

2018

 

$

310,423

 

 

$

 

 

$

454,969

 

(9)

$

 

 

$

158,937

 

 

$

5,500

 

(7)

$

929,829

 

Executive Vice President, Engineering

 

2017

 

 

297,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

341,232

 

(10)

 

 

 

 

148,750

 

 

 

5,400

 

(7)

 

792,882

 

Former Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

 

2020

 

$

369,823

 

 

$

 

 

$

799,960

 

(22)

$

 

 

$

3,670

 

(14)

$

1,173,453

 

 

2016

 

 

291,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,060,012

 

 

 

174,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,525,312

 

 

2019

 

$

365,458

 

 

$

 

 

$

799,922

 

(23)

$

 

 

 

5,600

 

(14)

$

1,170,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Byron Myers,

 

2018

 

$

309,616

 

 

$

 

 

$

454,969

 

(11)

$

 

 

$

158,523

 

 

$

5,500

 

(7)

$

928,608

 

 

2021

 

$

199,231

 

(18)

$

60,000

 

(24)

$

399,932

 

(25)

$

 

 

$

350,000

 

(26)

$

1,009,163

 

Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing

 

2017

 

 

245,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

546,878

 

(12)

 

 

 

 

122,212

 

 

 

5,400

 

(7)

 

919,490

 

Former Executive Vice President, Marketing

 

2020

 

$

352,692

 

 

$

 

 

$

399,934

 

(27)

$

 

 

$

1,400

 

(14)

$

754,026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

$

351,346

 

 

$

 

 

$

519,874

 

(28)

$

 

 

 

5,600

 

(14)

$

876,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford,

 

2018

 

$

91,200

 

(13)

$

 

 

$

718,428

 

(14)

$

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

18,742

 

(15)

$

928,370

 

Executive Vice President, Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based RSUs and RSAsrestricted stock awards (“RSAs”) and performance-based RSUs and RSAs granted under our Plan to each of our Named Executive Officersapplicable NEOs in 20182019, 2020 and 2021 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of time-based RSUs and RSAs is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, and the grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs and RSAs is calculated based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant and probable outcome of the performance measures for applicable performance period as of the date on which the performance-based RSUs and RSAs are granted.  This estimated fair value for performance-based RSUs and RSAs is different from (and lower than) the maximum value of performance-based RSUs and RSAs set forth below. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by our Named Executive Officers.NEOs. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see the notes to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.24, 2022.

(2)

The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of stock option awards granted to each of our Named Executive Officers in 2016 in each case calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see the notes to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019. For 2017 and 2018, no option awards were granted to our Named Executive Officers.

-44-


(3)

The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column represent amounts earned by each of our Named Executive Officersapplicable NEOs under and payable under the 20182021 Incentive Plan, 2017 Incentive Plan and 2016 Incentive Plan, all of which were paid in the subsequent fiscal year. There were no payments made to any of our NEOs under our 2020 Incentive Plan or 2019 Incentive Plan.

(3)

The salary for Mr. Shabshab for 2021 reflects a start date of February 8, 2021 and a base salary of $650,000.

(4)

Reflects a sign-on bonus in accordance with Mr. Shabshab’s, Mr. Parr’s, and Dr. Glezer’s respective employment agreements.

(5)

Includes the grant date value of $999,912$2,799,947 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $999,988 for performance-based RSUs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs was $1,499,983.

(6)

Reflects a $100,000 lump sum payment for moving expenses, in accordance with Mr. Shabshab’s employment agreement.

(7)

The salary for Mr. Sergesketter for 2021 reflects a start date of December 13, 2021 and a base salary of $40,000 per month.

(8)

The salary for Mr. Parr for 2021 reflects a start date of April 12, 2021 and a base salary of $460,000.

(9)

Includes the grant date value of $1,199,979 for time-based RSUs.

(10)

Reflects $9,022 of reimbursement of relocation expenses, in accordance with Mr. Parr’s employment agreement, and $1,892 of matching contributions made by the Company to the Company’s 401(k) savings plan.

-50-


(11)

The salary for Dr. Glezer for 2021 reflects a start date of June 21, 2021 with a base salary of $415,000 for his role as Chief Medical Officer through October 10, 2021 and a promotion to Chief Technology Officer with a base salary of $460,000, effective October 11, 2021.

(12)

Includes the grant date value of $799,985 for time-based RSUs.

(13)

Includes the grant date value of $199,966 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $199,966 for performance-based RSUs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs was $299,949.

(14)

Reflects the matching contributions made by the Company to the Company’s 401(k) savings plan, which was suspended effective July 1, 2020 due to the financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and reinstated on June 21, 2021.

(15)

Includes the grant date value of $199,967 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $199,967 for performance-based RSUs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs was $299,950.

(16)

Includes the grant date value of $349,899 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $749,934$349,899 for performance-based RSAs. TheAs of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $1,499,868.was $524,848.

(5)(17)

IncludesReflects $39,515 for Mr. Sanford’s reimbursement of relocation expenses, in accordance with his employment agreement effective August 17, 2018 and $5,600 of matching contributions under the grant date value of $1,200,010 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $899,939 for performance-based RSAs. The value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $1,199,919.

(6)

Includes the grant date value of $399,916 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $299,937 for performance-based RSAs. The value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $599,874.

(7)

Reflects $5,500 and $5,400, respectively, for the Named Executive Officers,Company’s 401(k) savings plan, which represents the maximum matching contributions made by the Company to the Company’s 401(k) savings plan for the benefit of the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, which is also the same maximum amount applicable to each participating employee for 2018 and 2017.  We did not match 401(k) contributions in 2016.2019.

(8)(18)

The salaries for Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Myers for 2021 were based on each individual’s current salary until June 4, 2021 in accordance with the transition agreement and release with Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Myers.

(19)

Includes the grant date value of $370,015$999,972 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $277,443$999,972 for performance-based RSUs. TheAs of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs is $369,924.was $1,499,958.

(9)(20)

Includes the grant date value of $259,982$999,956 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $999,956 for performance-based RSAs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs was $1,499,933.

(21)

Includes the grant date value of $649,955 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $649,955 for performance-based RSAs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs was $974,933.

(22)

Includes the grant date value of $399,979 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $194,987$399,979 for performance-based RSUs. TheAs of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs was $599,969.

(23)

Includes the grant date value of $399,961 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $399,961 for performance-based RSAs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs was $599,941.

(24)

Reflects a lump sum payment of $60,000 in accordance with Mr. Myers’ transition agreement.

(25)

Includes the grant date value of $199,966 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $199,966 for performance-based RSUs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs is $389,973.was $299,949.

(10)(26)

Reflects salary continuation payments for 12 months from Mr. Myers’ effective date of separation of June 4, 2021 in accordance with Mr. Myers’ transition agreement, a portion of which has been paid or will be paid in 2022.

(27)

Includes the grant date value of $195,029$199,967 for time-based RSUs and probable value of $199,967 for performance-based RSUs. As of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSUs was $299,950.

(28)

Includes the grant date value of $259,937 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $146,203$259,937 for performance-based RSAs. TheAs of the grant date, the value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $194,938.

(11)

Includes the grant date value of $259,982 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $194,987 for performance-based RSAs. The value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $389,973.

(12)

Includes the grant date value of $195,029 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $146,203 for performance-based RSAs. The value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $194,938.

(13)

The salary for Mr. Sanford for 2018 is based on a start date of September 17, 2018 and a base salary of $312,000.

(14)

Includes the grant date value of $374,889 for time-based RSAs and probable value of $343,539 for performance-based RSAs. The value of the maximum potential payout for such performance-based RSAs is $562,334.

(15)

Reflects $9,625 for Mr. Sanford’s reimbursement of relocation expenses, $3,157 for the associated tax gross up of reimbursement of relocation expenses and $5,000 lump sum payment for miscellaneous moving expenses in 2018, in accordance with his employment agreement effective August 17, 2018.was $389,906.

-45-

-51-

 


 

Grants of Plan-BasedPlan-Based Awards in 20182021

 

The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.  For more information, please refer to the section titled “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

 

Grant

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards ($)(1)

 

 

Estimated Future

Payments Under

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (#)(2)

 

 

All Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

 

 

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

 

 

Grant

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards ($)(1)

 

 

Estimated Future

Payments Under

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (#)(2)

 

 

All Stock

Awards:

Number

of Units

 

 

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

 

Name

 

Date

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

(#)(3)

 

 

Awards(4)

 

 

Date

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

(#)(3)

 

 

Awards(4)

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

3/2/2018

 

$

349,300

 

 

$

698,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

2/17/2021

 

$

493,466

 

 

$

986,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,196

 

 

$

999,912

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,690

 

 

$

2,799,947

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,196

 

 

 

12,294

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

749,934

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,818

 

 

 

28,227

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

999,989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

3/2/2018

 

$

142,000

 

 

$

284,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Sergesketter

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr

 

4/12/2021

 

$

198,871

 

 

$

397,742

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/7/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,015

 

 

$

1,199,979

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer

 

6/21/2021

 

$

111,027

 

 

$

222,055

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,298

 

 

$

799,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

2/17/2021

 

$

130,000

 

 

$

260,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,278

 

 

$

399,916

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

$

199,966

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,278

 

 

 

4,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

299,937

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

5,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

199,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brenton Taylor

 

3/2/2018

 

$

124,000

 

 

$

248,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

2/17/2021

 

$

146,800

 

 

$

293,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

$

259,982

 

 

3/1/2021

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,231

 

 

$

649,955

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

3,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

194,987

 

 

3/1/2021

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,231

 

 

 

18,347

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

649,955

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Byron Myers

 

3/2/2018

 

$

140,000

 

 

$

280,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/17/2021

 

$

140,000

 

 

$

280,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

$

259,982

 

 

3/1/2021

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

$

199,966

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

3,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

194,987

 

 

3/1/2021

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,763

 

 

 

5,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

199,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

9/17/2018

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/17/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,423

 

 

$

374,889

 

 

9/17/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,423

 

 

 

2,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

343,539

 

 

(1)

This column represents awards granted under our 20182021 Incentive Plan.These columns show the awards that were possible at the target and maximum levels of performance. The actual amounts paid to our Named Executive OfficersNEOs are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, and the calculation of the actual amounts paid is discussed more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Cash Incentive Compensation” section above.

(2)

This column represents awards of performance-based RSAsRSUs granted under our 2014 Plan, which are described in further detail above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and below in the “Outstanding Equity Incentive Plan.Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End” table. These columns show the awards that were possible at the target and maximum levels of performance.

(3)

This column represents awards of time-based RSAsRSUs granted under our 2014 Plan, which are described in further detail above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and below in the “Outstanding Equity Incentive Plan. The time-based RSAs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards (other than the award to Bart Sanford) is March 1, 2018; the vesting commencement date for Bart Sanford’s award is December 1, 2018.Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End” table.

(4)

The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair market value of stock and option awards granted in fiscal 20182021 and calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by our Named Executive Officers. NEOs. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see the notes to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.25, 2022.

(5)

The then-unvested portion of this award was forfeited upon the termination of the NEO’s employment with us.

-46--52-

 


 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents certain information concerning equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, as of December 31, 2018.

2021.

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Exercisable

 

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Unexercisable

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

 

 

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(1)

 

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

 

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market Payout

Value of

Unearned Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested(1)

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Unexercisable

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

 

 

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(1)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested(1)

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

10/10/2013

 

 

33,338

 

(2)

 

 

 

 

$

8.37

 

 

10/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,872

 

(2)

 

1,101,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,818

 

(3)

$

611,773

 

 

 

18,818

 

(4)

$

611,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Sergesketter

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr

 

5/7/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,015

 

(6)

$

585,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer

 

8/9/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,298

 

(7)

$

399,808

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

9/17/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

365

 

(8)

$

11,574

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/1/2014

 

 

15,220

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

$

16.62

 

 

3/31/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,022

 

(9)

$

33,225

 

 

 

1,090

 

(10)

$

35,436

 

 

5/15/2015

 

 

26,562

 

(4)

 

 

7,813

 

 

$

38.54

 

 

5/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,457

 

(11)

$

79,877

 

 

 

2,912

 

(12)

$

94,669

 

 

5/12/2016

 

 

54,895

 

(5)

 

 

30,105

 

 

$

44.19

 

 

5/11/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,763

 

(13)

$

122,335

 

 

 

3,763

 

(4)

$

122,335

 

 

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,014

 

(6)

$

1,119,268

 

 

 

8,741

 

(7)

$

1,085,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,196

 

(8)

$

1,017,697

 

 

 

12,294

 

(9)

$

1,526,546

 

Scott Wilkinson

(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

10/11/2011

 

 

1,685

 

(10)

 

 

 

 

$

0.75

 

 

10/10/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/10/2013

 

 

 

10,845

 

(15)

 

 

 

$

8.37

 

 

10/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/28/2012

 

 

17,946

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

$

0.81

 

 

3/27/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/15/2015

 

 

 

28,895

 

(16)

 

 

 

$

38.54

 

 

5/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/10/2013

 

 

10,845

 

(2)

 

 

 

 

$

8.37

 

 

10/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/12/2016

 

 

 

51,563

 

(17)

 

 

 

$

44.19

 

 

5/11/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/1/2014

 

 

65,311

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

$

16.62

 

 

3/31/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

205

 

(18)

$

6,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/15/2015

 

 

43,187

 

(4)

 

 

43,187

 

 

$

38.54

 

 

5/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3/1/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,168

 

(9)

$

37,972

 

 

 

1,246

 

(10)

$

40,507

 

 

5/12/2016

 

 

25,000

 

(5)

 

 

25,000

 

 

$

44.19

 

 

5/11/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/28/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,915

 

(11)

$

159,787

 

 

 

5,825

 

(12)

$

189,371

 

 

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,780

 

(6)

$

345,193

 

 

 

2,695

 

(12)

$

334,638

 

 

3/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,231

 

(13)

$

399,808

 

 

 

12,231

 

(4)

$

397,630

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,278

 

(8)

$

407,029

 

 

 

4,917

 

(9)

$

610,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brenton Taylor

 

3/28/2012

 

 

12,945

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

$

0.81

 

 

3/27/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/10/2013

 

 

33,483

 

(2)

 

 

 

 

$

8.37

 

 

10/9/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/1/2014

 

 

55,311

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

$

16.62

 

 

3/31/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/15/2015

 

 

21,459

 

(4)

 

 

6,511

 

 

$

38.54

 

 

5/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/12/2016

 

 

20,364

 

(5)

 

 

22,136

 

 

$

44.19

 

 

5/11/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,465

 

(6)

$

181,909

 

 

 

1,420

 

(7)

$

176,321

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

(8)

$

264,606

 

 

 

3,196

 

(9)

$

396,847

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Byron Myers

 

3/28/2012

 

 

1,480

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

$

0.81

 

 

3/27/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4/1/2014

 

 

7,105

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

$

16.62

 

 

3/31/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/15/2015

 

 

11,518

 

(4)

 

 

2,605

 

 

$

38.54

 

 

5/14/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/12/2016

 

 

11,145

 

(5)

 

 

8,855

 

 

$

44.19

 

 

5/11/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/8/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,348

 

(6)

$

291,551

 

 

 

2,276

 

(7)

$

282,611

 

 

3/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

(8)

$

264,606

 

 

 

3,196

 

(9)

$

396,847

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

9/17/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,423

 

(13)

 

176,694

 

 

 

2,134

 

(9)

 

264,979

 

 

(1)

The market value of unvested shares is calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares held by the applicable Named Executive OfficerNEO by the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 20182021 (the last trading day of 2018)2021), which was $124.17$34.00 per share.

(2)

These amounts represent awards of time-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. The option fullytime-based RSUs vest over three years, with 50% of the restricted stock units vested on NovemberMarch 1, 2017.2022, and the remaining 50% of the restricted stock units will vest in 1/8th quarterly installments over the following 2 years. The vesting commencement date for these awards is March 1, 2021.

(3)

1/4th of the shares subject to the option vest on April 1, 2015 and 1/48th of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

-47-


(4)

1/4th of the shares subject to the option vest on May 1, 2016, and 1/48th of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

(5)

1/4th of the shares subject to the option vest on May 1, 2017, and 1/48th of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

(6)

These amounts represent awards of time-based RSUs and RSAs granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The time-based RSUs vest over three years, with 25% of the restricted stock units will vest March 1, 2022, and RSAsthe remaining 75% of the restricted stock units will vest in 1/12th quarterly installments over the following 3 years.

(4)

This is an award of performance-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. This amount represents 100% of tranche 1 of the award of performance-based RSUs, plus 100% of tranche 2 and 100% of tranche 3 of the award of performance-based RSUs. In February 2022, our Compensation Committee determined that 150% of tranche 1 of the award of performance-based RSUs was earned based upon the achievement of the applicable performance goal in 2021. The actual award amount earned and vested for tranche 1 was 9,409 shares for Mr. Shabshab, 1,881 shares for Mr. Sanford, and 6,115 shares for Ms. Bauerlein. In accordance with the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 2 following the 2022 fiscal year. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further discussion on the 2021 performance-based RSUs and how and when the related performance goals are established.

-53-


(5)

Mr. Sergesketter’s offer letter did not include equity grants during his term as Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Sergesketter did not receive any equity grants during his employment with us.

(6)

This is an award of time-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. The time-based RSUs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards is June 1, 2021.

(7)

This is an award of time-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. The time-based RSUs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards is September 1, 2017.

(7)

This is a performance-based RSA granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. This amount represents 100% of tranche 2 of the performance-based RSA, plus 100% of tranche 3 of the performance-based RSA. In February 2019, our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee determined that 100% of tranche 2 of the performance-based RSA was earned based upon the achievement of the Company’s performance goals in 2018. The actual award amount earned and vested for tranche 2 was 4,370 shares for Mr. Wilkinson, 710 shares for Mr. Taylor, and 1,138 shares for Mr. Myers. In accordance with the terms of the award, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 3 following the 2019 fiscal year. Please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for a further discussion on the 2017 performance-based RSAs and RSUs and how and when the related performance goals are established.2021.

(8)

This is an award of time-based RSAs granted under our 2014 Plan. The time-based RSAs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for this award is December 1, 2018.

(9)

These amounts represent awards of time-based RSAs granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The time-based RSAs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards is March 1, 2018.2019.

(9)(10)

This is aan award of performance-based RSARSAs granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. This amount represents 150%100% of tranche 1 of the performance-based RSA, plus 150% of tranche 2 and tranche 3 of the award of performance-based RSA.RSAs. In February 2019,2022, our Compensation Nominating and Governance Committee determined that 129.7%150% of tranche 13 of the award of performance-based RSARSAs was earned based upon the achievement of the Company’sapplicable performance goals in 2018.2021. The actual award amount earned and vested for tranche 13 was 3,5431,635 shares for Mr. Wilkinson, 1,417Sanford and 1,869 shares for Ms. Bauerlein, 710 shares for Mr. Taylor, 920 shares for Mr. Myers, and 614 shares for Mr. Sanford. In accordance with the terms of the award, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 2 following the 2019 fiscal year and will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 3 following the 2020 fiscal year.Bauerlein. Please see the "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” for a further discussion on the 20182019 performance-based RSAs and RSUs and how and when the related performance goals aregoal was established.

(10)

The option fully vested on August 1, 2016.

(11)

The option fully vested on May 1, 2016.

(12)

This is a performance-based RSU granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. This amount represents 100% of tranche 2 of the 2017 performance-based RSU, plus 100% of tranche 3 of the performance-based RSU. In February 2019, our Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee determined that 100% of tranche 2 of the performance-based RSU was earned based upon the achievement of the Company’s performance goals in 2018. The actual award amount earned and vested for tranche 2 was 1,347 shares.  In accordance with the terms of the award, the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 3 following the 2019 fiscal year. Please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for a further discussion on the 2017 performance-based RSAs and RSUs and how and when the related performance goals are established.

(13)

These amounts represent awards of time-based RSAsRSUs granted under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The time-based RSAsRSUs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards is DecemberMarch 1, 2018.2020.

(12)

This is an award of performance-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. This amount represents 100% of tranche 2 of the award of performance-based RSUs, plus 100% of tranche 3 of the performance-based RSUs. In February 2022, our Compensation Committee determined that 150% of tranche 2 of the award of performance-based RSUs was earned based upon the achievement of the applicable performance goal in 2021. The actual award amount earned and vested for tranche 2 was 2,184 shares for Mr. Sanford and 4,369 shares for Ms. Bauerlein. In accordance with the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee will assess the performance conditions related to tranche 3 following the 2022 fiscal year. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further discussion on the 2021 performance-based RSUs and how and when the related performance goal was established.

-48-(13) These amounts represent awards of time-based RSUs granted under our 2014 Plan. The time-based RSUs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for these awards is March 1, 2021.

(14)

In accordance with each respective transition agreement, Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Myers terminated employment with us on June 4, 2021 and Ms. Bauerlein terminated employment with us on April 1, 2022.  On the applicable termination date, all unvested awards held by the applicable NEO ceased vesting and were forfeited.  Neither Mr. Wilkinson nor Mr. Myers had any outstanding equity as of December 31, 2021.

(15)

The option fully vested on November 1, 2017.

(16)

The option fully vested on May 1, 2019.

(17)

The option fully vested on May 1, 2020.

(18) This is an award of time-based RSAs granted under our 2014 Plan. The time-based RSAs vest over four years, with 25% vesting one year after the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting quarterly thereafter. The vesting commencement date for this award is March 1, 2018.

-54-

 


 

Option ExercisesExercises and Stock Awards Vesting During Fiscal 20182021

The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon exercise of stock options by each of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 and the number of shares acquired on vesting and the value realized on vesting of stock awards held by each of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Number of

shares Acquired

on Exercise

 

 

Value Realized

on Exercise

 

 

Number of shares

Acquired on Vesting

 

 

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

 

Number of

shares Acquired

on Exercise

 

 

Value Realized

on Exercise

 

 

Number of shares

Acquired on Vesting

 

 

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

Name

 

(#)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($)(2)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

(#)

 

 

($)(2)

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Michael Sergesketter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,084

 

 

 

158,851

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

26,386

 

 

$

4,191,984

 

 

 

8,468

 

 

$

1,506,312

 

 

 

167,933

 

 

 

5,002,930

 

 

 

10,657

 

 

 

589,936

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

103,260

 

 

 

11,107,721

 

 

 

2,610

 

 

 

464,349

 

 

 

94,345

 

 

 

3,561,403

 

 

 

6,334

 

 

 

331,551

 

Brenton Taylor

 

 

68,605

 

 

 

9,052,883

 

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

244,810

 

Byron Myers

 

 

53,565

 

 

 

9,196,630

 

 

 

2,205

 

 

 

392,280

 

 

 

42,705

 

 

 

1,006,566

 

 

 

2,362

 

 

 

131,075

 

Bart Sanford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Calculated by multiplying (i) the fair market value of common stock on the exercise date, which was determined using the closing price on the NASDAQ of a share of common stock on the date of exercise, or if such day is a holiday, on the immediately preceding trading day, or the disposition price if the shares are disposed of in a disqualified disposition, minus the exercise price, by (ii) the number of shares of common stock acquired upon exercise.

 

(2)

Calculated by multiplying (i) the fair market value of common stock on the exercisevesting date, which was determined using the closing price on the NASDAQ of a share of common stock on the vesting date, or if such day is a holiday, on the immediately preceding trading day, by (ii) the number of shares of common stock that vested.

Potential Payments Upon Termination andor Upon Termination Following a Change in Control

As described above in the “Employment Agreements and Post-Employment Compensation” and “Executive Employment Arrangements” sections,section above, the amended and restated executive employment agreements we entered into with the Named Executive OfficersNEOs provide for the severance compensation described above.Please see

Employment Agreements with Nabil Shabshab, Kristin Caltrider, George Parr, Stanislav Glezer and Bart Sanford

We entered into (i) an employment agreement with Nabil Shabshab, our Chief Executive Officer, effective February 8, 2021, (ii) an employment agreement with Kristin Caltrider, our Chief Financial Officer, effective March 21, 2022, (iii) an employment agreement with George Parr, our Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer, effective April 12, 2021, (iv) an amended and restated employment agreement with Stanislav Glezer, our Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, effective October 11, 2021, and (v) an amended and restated employment agreement with Bart Sanford, our Executive Vice President, Operations, effective August 17, 2018.

Each agreement provides that if the sectionapplicable NEO’s employment is terminated without “cause” (excluding by reason of death or disability) or the NEO resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement) outside of the  period beginning 3 months before a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement) and ending 12 months after a change in control (the “Change in Control Period”), such NEO will be eligible to receive the following benefits if he or she timely signs and does not revoke a release of claims and continues to comply with certain covenants in the employment agreement and his or her at-will employment, confidential information, invention assignment, and arbitration agreement with the Company:

Continued payment of his or her base salary (the “NEO Severance Payments”) for a period of 12 months (or in the case of Mr. Shabshab, 24 months);

Throughout the period during which he or she would be able to obtain COBRA coverage, the NEO and his or her eligible dependents will only be required to pay the portion of the costs of medical benefits as he or she

-55-


was required to pay as of the date of his termination, or he or she will receive taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event the Company determines that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law (the “NEO COBRA Benefits”); and

Solely in the case of Mr. Shabshab, if such termination occurs on or before the 2-year anniversary of the effective date of his employment agreement, accelerated vesting of the number of RSUs subject to the Shabshab New Hire Award that otherwise would have vested as of the 2-year anniversary of his termination date.  

If, during the Change of Control Period, the NEO’s employment is terminated without cause (excluding by reason of death or disability) or he or she resigns for good reason, he or she will be eligible to receive (i) the NEO Severance Payments for a period of 24 months (or in Mr. Sanford’s case, 12 months) following his or her termination, (ii) the NEO COBRA Benefits, and (iii) solely in the case of Mr. Shabshab, all of his outstanding Company equity awards will fully vest, and, unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement governing such Company equity award, the performance criteria for any performance‑based awards will be deemed to be satisfied at not less than the target level or such higher level as may be determined by the applicable Company equity plan, award agreement, or agreement governing the change of control.

In addition, Mr. Shabshab’s employment agreement also provides that in the event his employment with us terminates due to his death or disability, the number of RSUs subject to the Shabshab New Hire Award that otherwise would have vested as of the 2-year anniversary of his termination date will vest.

In the event any of the amounts provided for under an employment agreement or otherwise payable to the NEO would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and could be subject to the related excise tax, the NEO would be entitled “Executive Employment Arrangements” above.to receive either full payment of benefits under the employment agreement or such lesser amount which would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the greater amount of after-tax benefits to the NEO. None of the aforementioned employment agreements require us to provide any tax gross-up payments.

Offer Letter with Michael Sergesketter

Michael Sergesketter served as our interim Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Sergesketter’s offer letter had an initial term of two months and automatically extended on a month-to-month basis thereafter and provides that Mr. Sergesketter is an at-will employee. Under the offer letter, Mr. Sergesketter will receive a bonus of $10,000 upon the completion of the term of his offer letter.

-49-Mr. Sergesketter tendered his resignation as an officer effective upon the date Kristin Caltrider commenced employment. Mr. Sergesketter will provide transition services through no later than June 24, 2022.

Employment Agreements and Transition Agreements with Scott Wilkinson, Alison Bauerlein, and Byron Myers

We entered into (i) an amended and restated employment agreement with Scott Wilkinson, our former Chief Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2017, (ii) an amended and restated employment agreement with Alison Bauerlein, our former Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer, effective October 1, 2013, and (iii) an amended and restated employment agreement with Byron Myers, our Executive Vice President, Marketing, effective January 1, 2017.  Under their employment agreements, these NEOs were eligible to receive the severance and change of control benefits described below upon certain qualifying terminations. These employment agreements were superseded by (i) the transition agreement Mr. Wilkinson signed in February 2021 (as described below), in connection with his resignation as President, Chief Executive Officer, and director of the Company, (ii) the transition agreement Ms. Bauerlein signed in December 2021 (as described below), in connection with her resignation as Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer of the Company, and (iii) the transition agreement Mr. Myers signed in April 2021 (as described below), in connection with his resignation as Executive Vice President, Marketing of the Company.

-56-

 


 

Under each employment agreement, if the applicable NEO’s employment was terminated without “cause” (excluding by reason of death or disability) or the NEO resigned for “good reason” (as such terms were defined in the employment agreement), the NEO would have been eligible to receive the following benefits if he or she timely signed and did not revoke a release of claims and continued to comply with certain covenants in the employment agreement and his or her at-will employment, confidential information, invention assignment, and arbitration agreement with the Company:

the NEO Severance Payments for a period of 12 months (or if in the case of Mr. Wilkinson, 24 months); and

the NEO COBRA Benefits.

If, during the Change of Control Period, the NEO’s employment is terminated without cause (excluding by reason of death or disability) or he or she resigns for good reason, he or she will be eligible to receive (i) the NEO Severance Payments for a period of 24 months (or in Mr. Myers’ case, 12 months) following his or her termination and (ii) the NEO COBRA Benefits.

In the event any of the amounts provided for under the employment agreement or otherwise payable to the applicable NEO would have constituted “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and could be subject to the related excise tax, the NEO would have been entitled to receive either full payment of benefits under the employment agreement or such lesser amount which would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever resulted in the greater amount of after-tax benefits to the NEO. Each employment agreement did not require us to provide any tax gross-up payments.

In connection with Mr. Wilkinson’s retirement as President, Chief Executive Officer and as a director, we entered into a transition agreement and release with Mr. Wilkinson, whereby Mr. Wilkinson agreed to provide transition services to us as a non-executive employee until June 4, 2021. The transition agreement provides that during the period Mr. Wilkinson provides these transition services, he would continue to receive his then-current base salary, be eligible for a discretionary annual performance bonus award corresponding to fiscal year 2020 (if any), receive employment benefits pursuant to our benefit plans as in effect, and vest in his equity awards according to their terms.  

The transition agreement also provided that subject to (i) Mr. Wilkinson’s execution of the transition agreement and his timely execution of the supplemental release agreement attached to the transition agreement following the termination of his employment with us, (ii) both agreements going into effect and (iii) his fulfillment of all of the terms and conditions of both agreements, we would reimburse him for the premium payments he makes for COBRA coverage in an amount equal to the company-paid portion for such benefits as of immediately before the date his employment terminates for a period of up to 18 months (or taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event we determine that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law).  Following the termination of Mr. Wilkinson’s employment, he satisfied the condition to receive this benefit.

In connection with Ms. Bauerlein’s resignation as Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Treasurer, we entered into a transition agreement and release with Ms. Bauerlein, whereby Ms. Bauerlein agreed to provide transition services to us as a non-executive employee until April 1, 2022. The transition agreement provided that during the period Ms. Bauerlein provided these transition services, she would continue to receive her then-current base salary, be eligible for a discretionary annual performance bonus award corresponding to fiscal year 2021, receive employment benefits pursuant to our benefit plans as in effect, and vest in her equity awards according to their terms.  

The transition agreement also provided that subject to (i) Ms. Bauerlein’s execution of the transition agreement and her timely execution of the supplemental release agreement attached to the transition agreement following the termination of her employment with the Company, (ii) both agreements going into effect and (iii) her fulfillment of all of the terms and conditions of both agreements, the Company would (a) provide for the continuation of payments of her base salary for 12 months from the effective date of her separation, (b) provided she satisfactorily performs her transition duties, provide a cash lump sum payment of $60,000, (c) reimburse her for the premium payments she makes for COBRA coverage in an amount equal to the Company-paid portion for such benefits as of immediately before the date her employment terminates

-57-


for a period of up to 18 months (or taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event the Company determines that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law), and (d) extend the post-termination exercise period of Ms. Bauerlein’s stock options that are outstanding and vested as of the separation date to the date that is one year following the separation date, or, if earlier, the maximum term of the stock option.Following the termination of Ms. Bauerlein’s employment, she satisfied the condition to receive these benefits.

In connection with Mr. Myers’ resignation as Executive Vice President, Marketing, we entered into a transition agreement and release with Mr. Myers, whereby Mr. Myers agreed to provide transition services to us as a non-executive employee until June 4, 2021. The transition agreement provided that during the period Mr. Myers provides these transition services, he would continue to receive his then-current base salary, receive employment benefits pursuant to our benefit plans as in effect, and vest in his equity awards according to their terms.  

The transition agreement also provided that subject to (i) Mr. Myers’ execution of the transition agreement and his timely execution of the supplemental release agreement attached to the transition agreement following the termination of his employment with the Company, (ii) both agreements going into effect and (iii) his fulfillment of all of the terms and conditions of both agreements, the Company would (a) provide for the continuation of payments of his base salary for 12 months from the effective date of his separation and (b) reimburse him for the premium payments he makes for COBRA coverage in an amount equal to the Company-paid portion for such benefits as of immediately before the date his employment terminates for a period of up to 18 months (or taxable monthly payments for the equivalent period in the event the Company determines that the COBRA subsidy could violate applicable law). In addition, the transition agreement provided that if Mr. Myers satisfactorily performed the transition duties, the Company would pay Mr. Myers a lump sum of $60,000, less applicable withholdings, which would be paid within 30 days following the effectiveness of the supplemental release agreement attached to the transition agreement.  Following the termination of Mr. Myers’ employment, he satisfied the condition to receive these benefits.

2014 Equity Incentive Plan

The 2014 Plan provides all employees, including our NEOs, with the following vesting acceleration benefits:  in the event of an “involuntary termination” (as defined in the 2014 Plan) on or within 12 months following a “change in control” (as defined in the 2014 Plan), the participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, including shares as to which such awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on RSAs and RSUs will lapse, and, with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met.

Outstanding Performance-based Equity Awards Granted to the NEOs

Under the terms of the outstanding performance-based awards held by the NEOs, if, prior to the end of any performance period, there is a “change in control” (as defined in the 2014 Plan), then the target number of shares corresponding to that performance period will vest as of immediately prior to such change in control.

-58-


The following table provides information concerning the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided in the circumstances described below, assuming that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2018,2021, the last day of our fiscal year.

year.

 

Termination Without

Cause or Resignation for

Good Reason Not in

connection with a

Change in Control

 

 

Termination Without Cause

or Resignation for Good

Reason in connection with a

Change in Control

 

 

Death or Disability

 

 

Change in Control

 

 

Termination Without

Cause or Resignation for

Good Reason Not in

connection with a

Change in Control

 

 

Termination Without

Cause or Resignation for

Good Reason in connection with a

Change in Control

 

Name

 

($)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)

 

 

($)(1)

 

Scott Wilkinson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nabil Shabshab

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance payment

 

$

499,000

 

 

$

998,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,300,000

 

 

$

1,300,000

 

Continued health coverage

 

 

17,003

 

 

 

34,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,800

 

 

 

24,800

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

4,933,189

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

1,079,670

 

 

 

639,812

 

 

 

1,079,670

 

 

 

1,791,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alison Bauerlein

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Parr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance payment

 

$

355,000

 

 

$

710,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

460,000

 

 

$

920,000

 

Continued health coverage

 

 

17,003

 

 

 

34,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,159

 

 

 

21,159

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

3,339,948

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

612,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brenton Taylor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stanislav Glezer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance payment

 

$

310,000

 

 

$

620,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

460,000

 

 

$

920,000

 

Continued health coverage

 

 

18,002

 

 

 

36,005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

2,610,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Byron Myers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance payment

 

$

350,000

 

 

$

700,000

 

Continued health coverage

 

 

14,548

 

 

 

29,097

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

1,406,317

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

418,132

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bart Sanford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance payment

 

$

312,000

 

 

$

312,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

325,000

 

Continued health coverage

 

 

10,069

 

 

 

10,069

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,400

 

 

 

12,400

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

169,451

 

Accelerated vesting(2)

 

 

 

 

 

264,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

258,332

 

 

(1)

A For purposes of the severance payments and continued health coverage benefit under the NEOs’ employment agreements and the accelerated vesting under Mr. Shabshab’s employment agreement, a qualifying termination of employment is considered “in connection with a change in control” if such termination occurs within the period commencing three (3)3 months before and ending twelve (12)12 months after a “change of control (as defined in the NEO’s employment agreement).  For purposes of the accelerated vesting under the 2014 Plan, a qualifying termination of employment is considered “in connection with a “change in control” if such termination occurs on or within 12 months after a change in control (as defined in the Plan).

(2)

For purposes of valuing accelerated vesting, the values indicated in the table are calculated with respect to stock options, as the aggregate difference between $124.17, the$34.00 closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 20182021 (the last trading day of 2018)2021), and the exercise price of the applicable option, multiplied by the number of unvested shares accelerated, and,subject to the equity awards that are accelerated.  Values indicated under the “Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason in connection with respecta Change in Control” column are in addition to time-based and performance-based RSUs and RSAs, $124.17 multiplied by the number of unvested time-based RSUs and RSAs andvalues indicated under the number of unvested performance-based RSUs and RSAs at target levels of achievement.“Change in Control” column.

-50-CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted rules requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s total annual compensation to our CEO’s total annual compensation. For purposes of determining our CEO’s total annual compensation, we elected to use the total annual compensation of Mr. Shabshab, who was serving as our CEO on the date used to determine the median employee. For our last completed fiscal year, which ended December 31, 2021:

The median employee’s total annual compensation was $59,513. The median employee was determined based on the assumptions stated below.

Mr. Shabshab’s total annual compensation was $7,036,373.  

-59-

 


Based on the above, for 2021, the ratio of Mr. Shabshab’s total annual compensation to the median employee’s total annual compensation of all employees was approximately 118 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule”).

We identified a new median employee, which we were required to do under the CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule since we had last determined the median employee as of December 31, 2018.  For purposes of this year’s disclosure under the CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule, we determined the median employee as of December 31, 2021, at which time we and our consolidated subsidiary had approximately 1,118 employees, 1,110 of whom were U.S. employees, and approximately 8 (or approximately 0.7% of our total employee population) of whom are located outside of the United States in the Netherlands. In accordance with the permitted methodology for determining the “median employee”, we excluded all non-U.S. employees from our calculations. We then compared the total annual cash compensation earned by these employees for 2021 to determine the median employee, annualizing the compensation of all full-time and part-time employees who started their employment with us in 2021 but did not work for us or our consolidated subsidiaries for the entire year. Once we identified our median employee, we estimated such employee’s total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, yielding the median employee total annual compensation disclosed above.  

We determined Mr. Shabshab’s total annual compensation amount by taking the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2021 Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy.

 

Equity Compensation Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20182021 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.

 

 

(a)  Number of

 

 

(b)  Weighted

 

 

(c)  Number of

 

 

(a)  Number of

 

 

(b)  Weighted

 

 

(c)  Number of

 

 

securities to

 

 

average

 

 

securities remaining

 

 

securities to

 

 

average

 

 

securities remaining

 

 

be issued

 

 

exercise price

 

 

available for future

 

 

be issued

 

 

exercise price

 

 

available for future

 

 

upon exercise

 

 

of outstanding

 

 

issuance under equity

 

 

upon exercise

 

 

of outstanding

 

 

issuance under equity

 

 

of outstanding

 

 

options,

 

 

compensation plans

 

 

of outstanding

 

 

options,

 

 

compensation plans

 

 

options,

 

 

warrants and

 

 

(excluding securities

 

 

options,

 

 

warrants and

 

 

(excluding securities

 

Plan category

 

warrants and rights

 

 

rights (1)

 

 

reflected in column (a))

 

 

warrants and rights

 

 

rights (1)

 

 

reflected in column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2)(3)

 

 

1,194,664

 

 

$

30.75

 

 

 

2,657,312

 

 

 

814,793

 

 

$

23.89

 

 

 

2,051,194

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,194,664

 

 

$

 

 

 

2,657,312

 

 

 

814,793

 

 

$

 

 

 

2,051,194

 

 

(1)

The weighted average exercise price is calculated based solely on outstanding stock options.

(2)

Includes the following plans: 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, (“2014 Plan”), and 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).

(3)

The number of shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan also includes an annual increase on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2015, equal to the least of: (i) 895,346 shares; (ii) 4% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the last day of our immediately preceding fiscal year; or (iii) such other amount as our Board may determine.  Our 2014 Plan had 1,910,8641,481,381 shares available for issuance as of December 31, 2018.2021. Our ESPP provides for annual increases in the number of shares available for sale under the ESPP on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2015, equal to the least of: (i) 179,069 shares; (ii) 1.5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock on the last day of our immediately preceding fiscal year; or (iii) such other amount as may be determined by the administrator. Our ESPP had 746,448569,866 shares available for sale as of December 31, 2018.2021. For 2019,2022, our Board exercised its authority to not increase the shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan or the ESPP pursuant to these provisions.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted rules requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s total annual compensation to the CEO’s total annual compensation.  For our last completed fiscal year, which ended December 31, 2018:

The median employee’s total annual compensation was $34,572.  The median employee was determined based on the assumptions stated below.

Our CEO’s total annual compensation of was $2,687,338.  

Based on the above, for 2018, the ratio of our CEO’s total annual compensation to the median employee’s total annual compensation of all employees was 78 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

We identified a new median employee due to the significant increase of our employee population, primarily related to inside sales representatives hired throughout the year. We determined the median employee as of December 31, 2018, at which time we and our consolidated subsidiaries had approximately 1,099 full-time and part-time employees, approximately 1,086 of whom are U.S. employees, and approximately 13 (or approximately 1.2% of our total employee population) of whom are located outside of the United States.  In accordance with the permitted methodology for determining the “median employee”, we excluded all non-U.S. employees from our calculations.  We then compared the total annual cash compensation earned by these employees for 2018 to determine the median employee, annualizing the compensation of full-time employees who started their employment with us in 2018 but did not work for us or our consolidated subsidiaries for the entire year.  Once we identified our median employee, we estimated such employee’s total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, yielding the median employee total annual compensation disclosed above.  

We determined our CEO’s total annual compensation amount by taking the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2018 Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy.

-51--60-

 


 

SECURITYSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 15, 2019,April 11, 2022, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, for:

each of our directors and nominees for director;

each of our Named Executive Officers;NEOs;

all of our current directors and executive officers as a group; and

each person or group who we know beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 21,929,23822,835,794 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2019.April 11, 2022. We have deemed shares of our common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 or issuable pursuant to restricted stock units which are subject to vesting conditions expected to occur within 60 days of March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the stock option or restricted stock unit for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

-61-


Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Inogen, Inc., 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, CA 93117.

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

shares

 

 

shares

 

 

 

beneficially

 

 

beneficially

 

Name of beneficial owner

 

owned

 

 

owned

 

5% Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Novo Holdings A/S (1)

 

 

3,549,320

 

 

 

16.19

%

Brown Capital Management, LLC(2)

 

 

2,471,768

 

 

 

11.27

%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

 

 

2,233,303

 

 

 

10.18

%

Vanguard Group, Inc.(4)

 

 

2,001,727

 

 

 

9.13

%

Point72 Asset Management, L.P.(5)

 

 

1,285,624

 

 

 

5.86

%

The Brown Capital Mgmt Small Company Fund(2)

 

 

1,260,003

 

 

 

5.75

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Wilkinson (6)

 

 

209,733

 

 

*

 

Alison Bauerlein (7)

 

 

217,685

 

 

*

 

Brenton Taylor (8)

 

 

222,032

 

 

 

1.01

%

Byron Myers(9)

 

 

82,274

 

 

*

 

Bart Sanford(10)

 

 

11,497

 

 

*

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(11)

 

 

33,318

 

 

*

 

R. Scott Greer (12)

 

 

60,692

 

 

*

 

Benjamin Anderson-Ray (13)

 

 

31,505

 

 

*

 

Loren McFarland (14)

 

 

46,403

 

 

*

 

Heather Rider (15)

 

 

26,489

 

 

*

 

Scott Beardsley(16)

 

 

 

 

*

 

Raymond Huggenberger (17)

 

 

89,584

 

 

*

 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons) (18)

 

 

1,031,212

 

 

 

4.54

%

 

 

Number of

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

shares

 

 

shares

 

 

 

beneficially

 

 

beneficially

 

Name of beneficial owner

 

owned

 

 

owned

 

5% Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brown Capital Management, LLC(1)

 

 

4,079,086

 

 

 

17.86

%

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

 

 

3,373,036

 

 

 

14.77

%

Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)

 

 

2,522,259

 

 

 

11.05

%

The Brown Capital Mgmt Small Company Fund(1)

 

 

2,162,916

 

 

 

9.47

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and executive officers, including our NEOs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nabil Shabshab (4)

 

 

19,340

 

 

*

 

Kristin Caltrider (5)

 

 

 

 

*

 

George Parr(6)

 

 

4,504

 

 

*

 

Stanislav Glezer(7)

 

 

 

 

*

 

Bart Sanford(8)

 

 

9,628

 

 

*

 

Jason Somer(9)

 

 

 

 

*

 

Elizabeth Mora (10)

 

 

2,754

 

 

*

 

Heather Rider (11)

 

 

36,275

 

 

*

 

Kristen Miranda(12)

 

 

3,889

 

 

*

 

Glenn Boehnlein(13)

 

 

459

 

 

*

 

Kevin King(14)

 

 

459

 

 

*

 

Mary Kay Ladone(15)

 

 

459

 

 

*

 

Scott Wilkinson (16)

 

 

26,494

 

 

*

 

Alison Bauerlein (17)

 

 

132,098

 

 

*

 

Michael Sergesketter (18)

 

 

 

 

*

 

Byron Myers(19)

 

 

35,540

 

 

*

 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) (20)

 

 

271,899

 

 

 

1.19

%

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

-52-


(1)

Based solely on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 2, 2018, Novo Holdings A/S has sole voting and dispositive power over all 3,549,320 shares held by Novo Holdings A/S. Novo Holdings A/S is a Danish limited liability company. The Board of Directors of Novo Holdings A/S, which, as of March 15, 2019, consists of Francis Michael Cyprian Cuss, Jean-Luc Butel, Jeppe Christiansen, Steen Riisgaard, Vivianne Monges and Lars Rebien Sorensen, has shared investment and voting control with respect to the shares held by Novo Holdings A/S and may exercise such control only with the support of a majority of the members of the Novo Holdings A/S Board of Directors. As such, no individual member of the Novo Holdings A/S Board of Directors is deemed to hold any beneficial ownership or reportable pecuniary interest in the shares held by Novo Holdings A/S. The address of Novo Holdings A/S is Tuborg Havnevej 19, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

(2)

Based solely on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on March 8, 2019,February 14, 2022, Brown Capital Management, LLC has sole voting power as to 1,528,8582,672,138 shares and sole dispositive power as to 2,471,7684,079,086 shares and Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund, a registered investment company, which is managed by Brown Capital Management, LLC, has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 1,260,0032,162,916 shares. Brown Capital Management, LLC is a Maryland limited liability company, and its address is 1201 N. Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Brown Capital Management Small Company Fund is a series portfolio of Brown Capital Management Mutual Funds, a Delaware statutory trust, and its address is 1201 N. Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(3)(2)

Based solely on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 28, 2019,2022, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power as to 2,186,0593,328,931 shares and sole dispositive power as to 2,233,3033,373,036 shares.  The shares reported as being beneficially held by BlackRock, Inc. may be held by one or more of the following subsidiaries:  BlackRock InternationalLife Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Fund Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited,Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Fund Advisors,Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, and BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC and FutureAdvisor, Inc.Fund Managers Ltd.  BlackRock, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and the address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055.  

(4)(3)

Based solely on the most recently available Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019,10, 2022, Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power as to 37,015 shares, shared voting power as to 1,94637,196 shares, sole dispositive power as to 1,964,4822,468,269 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 37,24553,990 shares. The shares reported as being beneficially held by Vanguard Group, Inc. may be held by one or more of the following subsidiaries: Vanguard Asset Management, Limited, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TheVanguard Global Advisors, LLC, Vanguard Group Inc., is the beneficial owner of 35,299 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts.(Ireland) Limited, Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TheLtd, Vanguard Group,Investments Canada Inc., is the beneficial owner of 3,662 shares as result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.Vanguard

-62-


Investments Hong Kong Limited, and Vanguard Group, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporationInvestments UK, Limited and the address of Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PennsylvaniaPA 19355.

(5)

Based solely on the information contained in the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2019, (i) Point72 Asset Management, L.P., its general partner Point72 Capital Advisors, Inc. and Steven A. Cohen, who controls Point72 Asset Management, L.P. and Point72 Capital Advisors, Inc., beneficially own an aggregate of 1,260,218 shares held by certain investment funds managed by Point72 Asset Management L.P., with shared power to vote and dispose of all 1,260,218 shares, and (ii) Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC and Steven A. Cohen, who controls Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC, beneficially own an aggregate of 25,406 shares held by certain investment funds managed by Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC, with shared power to vote and dispose of all 25,406 shares. Each of Point72 Asset Management, L.P., Point72 Capital Advisors, Inc., Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC, and Steven A. Cohen disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. The principal business address of Point72 Asset Management, L.P., Point72 Capital Advisors, Inc. and Steven A. Cohen is 72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, CT 06902. The principal business address of Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC is 330 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

(6)(4)

Consists of 63,05015,655 shares held including 50,279 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time- and performance-based RSAs, and options to purchase 146,683 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  

(7)

Consists of 38,085 shares held, including 15,083 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time- and performance-based RSAs, and options to purchase 179,600 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  Excludes 4,549 shares issuable upon vesting of time- and performance-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.

(8)

Consists of 65,482 shares held, including 11,846 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time- and performance-based RSAs, and options to purchase 156,584 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  Also includes 842 shares owned by Mr. Taylor’s spouse.

(9)

Consists of 45,819 shares held, including 13,076 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time- and performance-based RSAs, and options to purchase 36,455 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  

(10)

Consists of 11,497 shares held, including 11,023 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time- and performance-based RSAs.  

(11)

Consists of options to purchase 32,329 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019 and 9893,685 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.April 11, 2022. Excludes shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(12)(5)

Kristin Caltrider was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer effective March 21, 2022. Excludes shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(6)

Consists of 14,485 shares held of record by R. Scott Greer and Michelle Greer Revocable Trust, 15,218 shares held of record by R. Scott Greer, options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019 and 9894,504 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  Mr. Greer has shared voting and investment power with respect to theApril 11, 2022.  Excludes shares heldissuable upon vesting of record by R. Scott Greer and Michelle Greer Revocable Trust.

-53-


(13)

Consists of 4,516 shares held of record by Benjamin M. Anderson-Ray Revocable Living Trust, options to purchase 26,000 shares of common stock that are exercisabletime-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019April 11, 2022.

(7)

Stanislav Glezer was appointed as Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer on June 21, 2021 and 989promoted to the role of Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer effective October 11, 2021. Excludes shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(8)

Consists of 8,826 shares held, including 1,085 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to time-based RSAs, and 802 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  Mr. Anderson-Ray has shared voting and investment power with respect to theApril 11, 2022.  Excludes shares heldissuable upon vesting of record by Benjamin M. Anderson-Ray Revocable Living Trust.time-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(14)(9)

ConsistsJason Somer was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel effective July 21, 2021. Excludes shares issuable upon vesting of options to purchase 45,414 shares of common stock that are exercisabletime-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019 and 989April 11, 2022.

(10)

Elizabeth Mora was appointed as a director effective May 24, 2021. Consists of 2,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.  April 11, 2022.

(15)(11)

Consists of 3,00011,021 shares held, options to purchase 22,500 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019April 11, 2022 and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.April 11, 2022. Also includes 2,000 shares held by Ms. Rider’s spouse.

(16)

Scott Beardsley, a member of our Board, is employed as a Managing Partner by Novo Ventures (US), Inc., which provides certain consultancy services to Novo Holdings A/S.  Mr. Beardsley is not deemed to be a beneficial owner of, nor does he have a reportable pecuniary interest in, the shares held by Novo Holdings A/S.

(17)(12)

Consists of 6,8081,135 shares held options to purchase 81,787 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019 and 9892,754 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of March 15, 2019.April 11, 2022.

(18)(13)

Glenn Boehnlein was appointed as a director effective March 22, 2022. Consists of 260,256 shares held, including 101,307 shares of unvested restricted stock, options to purchase 757,352 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2019 and 5,934459 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(14)

Kevin King was appointed as a director effective March 15, 2019. Excludes 4,54922, 2022. Consists of 459 shares issuable upon vesting of time- and performance-basedtime-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(15)

Mary Kay Ladone was appointed as a director effective March 15, 2019.22, 2022. Consists of 459 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

-54-(16) Consists of 26,494 shares held.

(17)

Consists of 40,795 shares held and options to purchase 91,303 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

(18) Michael Sergesketter was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer effective December 13, 2021. His offer letter did not include equity grants during his term as Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Sergesketter did not receive any equity grants during his employment with us.

(19) Consists of 35,540 shares held.

(20) Consists of 139,466 shares held, options to purchase 113,803 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of April 11, 2022 and 18,630 shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022. Excludes shares issuable upon vesting of time-based RSUs not vesting within 60 days of April 11, 2022.

-63-

 


 

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

We have adopted a formal written policy providing that our Audit Committee will be responsible for reviewing “related party transactions,” which are transactions (i) in which we are or will be a participant, (ii) in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and (iii) in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect interest. For purposes of this policy, a related person will be defined as a director, nominee for director, executive officer, or greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock and their immediate family members. Under this policy, all related party transactions may be consummated or continued only if approved or ratified by our Audit Committee.

Since January 1, 2018,2021, we have not entered into any transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions to which we will be a party, in which:

the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

 

-55--64-

 


 

OTHER MATTERS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC reports regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our securities. Except as set forth below, weWe believe that our directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements in 2018.2021 except for the following: 1) Mr. Shabshab filed a Form 4/A on April 5, 2021 to correct the number of restricted stock unit shares awarded to him on March 1, 2021; Mr. McFarland filed a late Form 4 on March 31, 2021 to report a stock option exercise on March 23, 2021; 3) Mr. Huggenberger filed a late Form 4 on March 31, 2021 to report a stock option exercise on March 23, 2021; and 4) Ms. Bauerlein filed a Form 4/A on September 3, 2021 to correct the reported shares withheld to cover her tax withholding liability in connection with a portion of a time-based restricted stock award that vested on June 1, 2021. The late filings and amendments to filings were due to administrative oversight by the Company’s stock administration.

In making these statements, we have relied upon examination of the filings made with the SEC and the written representations of our directors and executive officers.

Available Information

Our financial statements for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 are included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K. This proxy statement and our Annual Report are posted on the Investor Relations section of our website at http://investor.inogen.com and are available from the SEC at its website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of our Annual Report without charge by sending a written request to Inogen, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, California 93117.

Company Website

We maintain a website at www.inogen.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

 

-56--65-

 


 

PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERSSTOCKHOLDERS FOR 20192023 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with next year’s Annual Meeting must submit their proposals so that they are received at Inogen’s principal executive offices no later than the close of business (5:30 p.m. Pacific Time) on November 27, 2019.December 22, 2022. Pursuant to the rules promulgated by the SEC, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included.

In order to be properly brought before the 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a stockholder’s notice of a matter the stockholder wishes to present, or the person or persons the stockholder wishes to nominate as a director, must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary of Inogen at its principal executive offices not less than 45 nor more than 75 days before the first anniversary of the date on which Inogen first mailed its proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. As a result, any notice given by a stockholder pursuant to these provisions of our Bylaws must be received no earlier than January 11, 2020February 5, 2023 and no later than the close of business (5:30 p.m. Pacific Time) on February 10, 2020,March 7, 2023, unless our 20202023 Annual Meeting date occurs more than 30 days before or 60 days after May 9, 2019.June 8, 2023. In that case, we must receive proposals no earlier than the close of business on the 120th120th day prior to the date of the 20202022 Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th90th day prior to the date of the 20202023 Annual Meeting or the 10th10th day following the day on which we first make a public announcement of the date of the meeting.

To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice must include the specified information concerning the proposal or nominee as described in our Bylaws. A stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal or nomination is encouraged to seek independent counsel about our Bylaw and SEC requirements. We will not consider any proposal or nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the Bylaw and SEC requirements for submitting a proposal or nomination.

Notices of intention to present proposals at the 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, Inogen, Inc., 326 Bollay301 Coromar Drive, Goleta, CA 93117. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.

*           *           *

The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.  If any additional matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the enclosed proxy card will have discretion to vote the shares of common stock they represent in accordance with their own judgment on such matters.

It is important that your shares of common stock be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold.  You are, therefore, urged to vote over the Internet or by telephone as instructed on the proxy card or, if you received printed proxy materials, execute and return, at your earliest convenience, the enclosed proxy card in the envelope that has also been provided.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Goleta, California
March 26, 2019April 21, 2022

 

 

-57--66-

 


 

 

APPENDIX A – UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION FROM GAAP TO NON-GAAP

APPENDIX A – UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION FROM GAAP TO NON-GAAP

 

APPENDIX A – UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION FROM GAAP TO NON-GAAP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Other Non-GAAP Financial Information

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Other Non-GAAP Financial Information

 

Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Other Non-GAAP Financial Information

 

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

Non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net income

 

$

51,845

 

 

$

21,002

 

Net loss

 

$

(6,333

)

 

$

(5,829

)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

(3,259

)

 

 

(765

)

 

 

(129

)

 

 

(909

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(11,390

)

 

 

8,654

 

 

 

14,992

 

 

 

549

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

11,295

 

 

 

12,302

 

 

 

21,628

 

 

 

18,581

 

EBITDA (non-GAAP)

 

 

48,491

 

 

 

41,193

 

 

 

30,158

 

 

 

12,392

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

9,640

 

 

 

10,943

 

 

 

8,203

 

Change in fair value of earnout liability

 

 

(11,596

)

 

 

1,053

 

Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)

 

$

48,491

 

 

$

50,833

 

 

$

29,505

 

 

$

21,648

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

Non-GAAP net income

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net income

 

$

51,845

 

 

$

21,002

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Operating Income (Loss)

 

$

9,240

 

 

$

(12,025

)

Non-GAAP adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 U.S. tax reform (1)

 

 

 

 

 

7,578

 

Non-GAAP net income

 

$

51,845

 

 

$

28,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Years ended December 31,

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Operating Income

 

$

37,892

 

 

$

27,590

 

Non-GAAP adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Aera intangible amortization

 

 

7,772

 

 

 

7,772

 

Change in fair value of earnout liability

 

 

(11,596

)

 

 

810

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

12,790

 

 

 

9,640

 

 

 

10,943

 

 

 

8,203

 

Stock-based compensation payroll tax

 

 

528

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

193

 

 

 

34

 

Adjusted Operating Income (non-GAAP)

 

$

51,210

 

 

$

37,376

 

 

$

16,552

 

 

$

4,794

 

 

(1)

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted into law, which significantly changes existing U.S. tax law and includes numerous provisions that affect the Company. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an estimated one-time net charge due to the impact of changes in the tax rate, primarily on deferred tax assets. There were no related charges during the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

-58--67-

 


 

 

INOGEN, INC. 326 BOLLAY DRIVE GOLETA, CA 93117 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instruction*s to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Class II Directors Nominees 01 Loren McFarland 02 Benjamin Anderson-Ray 03 Scott Wilkinson Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. 3. Approval on an advisory basis of our executive compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

 


 

 

 

0000554846_2 R1.0.0.24 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice &and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com INOGEN, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 09, 2019June 8, 2022 10:00 AM PDT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Mr. Scott WilkinsonNabil Shabshab and Ms. Alison Bauerlein,Jason Somer, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorizesauthorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of INOGEN, INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually at 10:00 AM, PDT on May 09, 2019,June 8, 2022 via the Internet at 326 Bollay Drive, Goleta, CA 93117,www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/INGN2022, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side